My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 3: Ratification of Unanimous and Non-Uanimous IGR Actions
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2011
>
CC Agenda - 02/14/11 Meeting
>
Item 3: Ratification of Unanimous and Non-Uanimous IGR Actions
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/11/2011 11:04:53 AM
Creation date
2/11/2011 10:05:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
2/14/2011
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
212
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
HB 2675 <br /> <br /> <br />Relating Clause: Relating to possession of controlled substances; declaring an emergency. <br /> <br />Title: Reduces possession of user quantity of controlled substance in Schedules I and II to Class <br />A misdemeanor if person has not previously been convicted of possession of controlled <br />substance. <br /> <br />Sponsored by: Introduced and printed pursuant to House Rule 12.00. Presession filed (at the request of <br />House Interim Committee on Judiciary) <br /> <br />URL: http://www.leg.state.or.us/11reg/measpdf/hb2600.dir/hb2675.intro.pdf <br /> <br />Contact Respondent Dept Updated Priority Recommendation <br />Chuck Tilby EPD-ADM 01/20/2011 Pri 3 Oppose <br /> <br />Comments: If a person has been convicted of a misdemeanor possession charge, the record of that <br />conviction is not available except through OJIN which is a system that is not designed to <br />be accessed in operational situations. Therefore, it would be very difficult to determine if <br />the subject had been convicted prior to a new possession. It is likely, then, that police <br />would consistently "over charge" defendants creating a bad situation for the defendant, <br />but also creating more work for prosecutors who would have to change the original <br />paperwork and court filings. Cost would be a factor worthy of opposition. <br /> <br /> <br />HB 2676 <br /> <br />Relating Clause: Relating to public employees; declaring an emergency. <br /> <br />Title: Prohibits public body from disclosing recording of public employee made during <br />investigation of employee’s conduct unless employee consents in writing. <br /> <br />Sponsored by: Introduced and printed pursuant to House Rule 12.00. Presession filed (at the request of <br />House Interim Committee on Judiciary) <br /> <br />URL: http://www.leg.state.or.us/11reg/measpdf/hb2600.dir/hb2676.intro.pdf <br /> <br />Contact Respondent Dept Updated Priority Recommendation <br />Jerry Lidz CS-CMO-ATTY 01/21/2011 -- Neutral <br /> <br />Comments: I don’t know what prompted this bill. Seems like a response to some event that I’m not <br />aware of. Also seems unnecessary. I defer to Alana and Susan on this. <br /> <br />Contact Respondent Dept Updated Priority Recommendation <br />Susan Mullett CS-HR 01/24/2011 -- Neutral <br /> <br />Comments: Support City Attorney’s Recommendation. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />28 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.