My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 3: Ratification of Unanimous IGR Actions and Action on Non-Unanimous IGR Actions
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2011
>
CC Agenda - 02/28/11 Meeting
>
Item 3: Ratification of Unanimous IGR Actions and Action on Non-Unanimous IGR Actions
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/25/2011 11:42:31 AM
Creation date
2/25/2011 11:07:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
2/28/2011
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
201
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br /> <br />ATTACHMENT D <br />IGR BILL REPORT <br />FEBRUARY 16, 2011 / IGR COMMITTEE MEETING <br />CITY OF EUGENE <br /> <br /> <br />HB 2659 <br /> <br />Relating Clause: Relating to violations. <br /> <br />Title: Authorizes district attorney or city attorney to allow private party or, under certain <br />circumstances, private party’s attorney to prosecute certain traffic violations. <br /> <br />Sponsored by: Introduced and printed pursuant to House Rule 12.00. Presession filed (at the request of <br />House Interim Committee on Judiciary) <br /> <br /> <br />URL: http://www.leg.state.or.us/11reg/measpdf/hb2600.dir/hb2659.intro.pdf <br /> <br />Contact Respondent Dept Updated Priority Recommendation <br />Jerry Lidz CS-CMO-ATTY 1/21/2011 Pri 3 Oppose <br /> <br />Comments: To me, it's not good policy to authorize a private party or a private party's attorney to <br />prosecute a violation, even if it's only when the city attorney or DA approves it. I could <br />be convinced otherwise if the City Prosecutor or Muni Court thinks it's a good idea. Since <br />it would happen only rarely and only when a city official approves, I don't think this <br />merits much attention. <br /> <br />Contact Respondent Dept Updated Priority Recommendation <br />Jeff Perry CS-MUNI 2/7/2011 Pri 3 Oppose <br /> <br />Comments: The City rarely sees a request for an individual to prosecute a violation that they witness <br />so the impact would the bill is likely minimal. However, the cases are a tremendous <br />amount of work to process for the City Prosecutor and the court. A person must swear out <br />a citation in front of a judge and then the court must direct EPD staff to serve the citation <br />- a potentially time intensive process. <br /> <br /> <br />HB 2711 <br /> <br />Relating Clause: Relating to courts. <br /> <br />Title: Creates Joint Committee on State Courts Revenue Structure. <br /> <br />Sponsored by: Introduced and printed pursuant to House Rule 12.00. Presession filed (at the request of <br />House Interim Committee on Judiciary for Joint Interim Committee on State Justice <br />System Revenues) <br /> <br /> <br />URL: http://www.leg.state.or.us/11reg/measpdf/hb2700.dir/hb2711.intro.pdf <br /> <br />Contact Respondent Dept Updated Priority Recommendation <br />Jeff Perry CS-MUNI 2/3/2011 Pri 3 Oppose <br />1 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.