Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />HB 3079 <br /> <br />Relating Clause: Relating to public procurement; declaring an emergency. <br /> <br />Title: Requires contracting agency to give preference to bidder or proposer that releases smaller <br />total amount of atmospheric carbon dioxide, methane and ozone during or as result of <br />manufacturing, transporting and disposing of goods or while providing services that are <br />subject of procurement. <br /> <br />Sponsored by: By Representative HUNT <br /> <br />URL: http://www.leg.state.or.us/11reg/measpdf/hb3000.dir/hb3079.intro.pdf <br /> <br />Contact Respondent Dept Updated Priority Recommendation <br />Babe O’Sullivan CS-CMO 2/14/2011 -- Monitor <br /> <br />Comments: Because the provisions of the bill are not clear at this time, staff recommends we monitor <br />the bill to gather more information. I would support the bill if amended to address <br />concerns voiced by the other legislative coordinators. This bill would provide important <br />guidelines for developing local procurement policies as called for in the Community <br /> <br />Climate and Energy Action Plan. <br /> <br />Contact Respondent Dept Updated Priority Recommendation <br />Ethan Nelson PDD-BPS 2/14/2011 -- Monitor <br /> <br />Comments: The concept of this bill supports the City of Eugene’s Climate and Energy Action Plan <br />goals and specific objectives. Concerns raised by staff include lack of clarity in the bill <br />and the subsequent fiscal impact to the city from this lack of clarity. The model rule <br />process identified in ORS 279A.065 provides ample involvement from local government <br />into the rule making process to address these concerns. Specifically, this includes <br />involvement in the rule making process (ORS 279A.065 (1)) and an exemption clause for <br />local government to the model rule (ORS 279A.065 (5a)). More importantly, Federal, <br />State, and Local governments must start to account for the embodied carbon emissions in <br />procured products and services. This will not come without a cost in public agency staff <br />time or a possible increase in the products and services. The proposal outlined in this bill <br />places the burden of staff time in rule and system development on the state, not the local <br />jurisdiction. This should be supported as it reduces the local cost burden to develop <br />model procurement policies as well as provide consistency across jurisdictions within the <br />state. Lastly, the bill clearly states that the preference for low carbon products does not <br />become the sole measurement for evaluating a bid/proposal. This bill most likely will not <br />make it out of committee, yet the City of Eugene should take at least a neutral stance and <br />offer amendments rather than oppose legislation that advances our climate policy goals <br /> <br />(Climate and Energy Action Plan, Strategy 22.3 a-c). <br /> <br /> <br />Contact Respondent Dept Updated Priority Recommendation <br />Jamie Garner CS-FIN 2/14/2011 -- Monitor <br /> <br />7 <br /> <br /> <br />