My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 3: Ratification of Unanimous IGR Actions and Action on Non-Unanimous IGR Actions
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2011
>
CC Agenda - 02/28/11 Meeting
>
Item 3: Ratification of Unanimous IGR Actions and Action on Non-Unanimous IGR Actions
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/25/2011 11:42:31 AM
Creation date
2/25/2011 11:07:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
2/28/2011
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
201
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
repurchase rights can be included in the condemnation action. This bill appears to include <br />the same repurchase provisions for property that did not go as far as to have had the <br />actual condemnation action filed with the courts. The present law includes the repurchase <br />value to go up at 7% per year above what the condemning agency paid. I can only recall <br />one owner that was considering the repurchase from a condemnation in the early 90's, but <br />after calculating the 7% per year determined it was not feasible. It is seldom the city <br />would acquire and not use the property within 10 years. This bill is adding property by <br />which a condemnation resolution or ordinance was first executed, but not yet filed in <br />court. The majority of city acquisitions are willing sellers and does not involve a <br />condemnation res or ord. As such it does not appear this would affect most city <br />acquisitions. <br /> <br /> <br />SB 0630 <br /> <br />Relating Clause: Relating to the regulation of energy-related information for buildings. <br /> <br />Title: Limits ability of local government to disclose energy score information regarding <br />building. <br /> <br />Sponsored by: By COMMITTEE ON JUDICIARY <br /> <br />URL: http://www.leg.state.or.us/11reg/measpdf/sb0600.dir/sb0630.intro.pdf <br /> <br />Contact Respondent Dept Updated Priority Recommendation <br />Mike Penwell CS-FAC 2/11/2011 Pri 2 Oppose <br /> <br />Comments: I agree with the comments of Ethan Nelson and Babe O’Sullivan. <br /> <br />Contact Respondent Dept Updated Priority Recommendation <br />Ethan Nelson PDD-BPS 2/9/2011 Pri 2 Oppose <br /> <br />Comments: This would severely limit the City of Eugene and EWEB's ability to provide residents <br />and businesses energy performance data on buildings. Much of the current research is <br />focused on energy use in buildings and providing owners and renters with accurate data <br />on the energy performance of the buildings (both residential and commercial). Without <br />the ability to inform the consumer market on energy performance, the City will be <br />severely limited in our ability to implement Building and Energy recommendations from <br />the Climate and Energy Action Plan; additionally, this legislation would prohibit EWEB <br />from advancing their conservation and efficiency projects which has continued to keep <br />customer rates steady over the years. <br /> <br />Contact Respondent Dept Updated Priority Recommendation <br />Babe O’Sullivan CS-CMO 2/14/2011 Pri 2 Oppose <br /> <br />Comments: This bill hampers local government efforts to promote building audits and energy <br />efficiency upgrades. Disclosure of energy scores is a good idea for increasing market <br />demand for more energy efficiency buildings. <br /> <br />Contact Respondent Dept Updated Priority Recommendation <br />Jerry Lidz CS-CMO-ATTY 2/13/2011 Pri 2 Oppose <br />14 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.