My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 3: Ratification of Unanimous IGR Actions and Action on Non-Unanimous IGR Actions
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2011
>
CC Agenda - 02/28/11 Meeting
>
Item 3: Ratification of Unanimous IGR Actions and Action on Non-Unanimous IGR Actions
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/25/2011 11:42:31 AM
Creation date
2/25/2011 11:07:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
2/28/2011
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
201
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />Staff Recommendation: Priority 3, Oppose (By Steve Nystrom) <br /> IGR Committee Vote: Monitor (2/1, Poling, Clark/Taylor, No) <br /> <br />(See page 7 - 8 of the February 2, IGR Bill Report for staff comments). <br /> <br />HB 2609: This bill would require metropolitan service districts and cities with populations of 25,000 <br />or more that are outside metropolitan service districts to provide rolling, five-year supplies <br />of shovel-ready buildable lands for needed housing and for industrial and commercial <br />uses. <br /> <br />Staff Recommendation: Priority 2, Oppose (By Steve Nystrom) <br /> IGR Committee Vote: Monitor (2/1, Clark, Poling/Taylor, No) <br /> <br />(See page 20 – 21 of the February 2, IGR Bill Report for staff comments). <br /> <br />FEBRUARY 9, 2011: <br /> <br />HB 2518: This bill would permits local governments to impose a real estate transfer tax or fee, <br />provided a tax or fee that is structured progressively based on consideration paid for <br />property, transfer in which buyer is first-time homebuyer or exempt, and a marginal rate <br />of tax or fee decrease as length of ownership by seller increases <br />. <br /> <br />Staff Recommendation: Priority 2, Support (By Larry Hill) <br /> IGR Committee Vote: Neutral (2/1, Clark, Poling/Taylor, No) <br /> <br />(See page 9 of the February 9, IGR Bill Report for staff comments). <br /> <br />HB 2563: This bill would create and adjust sunset dates for certain exemptions to property taxation. <br /> <br />Staff Recommendation: Priority 2, Support (By Larry Hill) <br /> IGR Committee Vote: Priority 3, Oppose (2/1, Clark, Poling/Taylor, No) <br /> <br />(See page 11 of the February 9, IGR Bill Report for staff comments). <br /> <br />FEBRUARY 16, 2011: <br /> <br />HB 2370: This bill would require local governments to provide ODOT at least a 30-day notice <br />before offering real property for sale, exchange, conveyance or lease, if the real property is <br />within 100 feet of a railroad right of way or is within 500 feet of an at-grade rail crossing. <br />If, within 30 days after the notice ODOT notifies the local government that the department <br />is interested in obtaining the real property to facilitate the current delivery or future <br />expansion of rail service, the bill requires the local government to give the department the <br />first opportunity to obtain the property. <br /> <br />Staff Recommendation: Priority 2, Support (By Brenda Wilson) <br /> IGR Committee Vote: Priority 2, Support (2/1, Taylor, Clark/Poling, No) <br /> <br />(No staff comments – support is at the request of Representative Nathanson) <br />\\Cesrv500\cc support\CMO\2011 Council Agendas\M110228\S1102283.doc <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.