Laserfiche WebLink
back another parcel of equal size. While this may not be the intent of the bill, such an <br />obligation would be completely unrealistic. <br /> <br />Beyond this concern, the language of the bill provides very little clarity on how and when <br />such land would need to be provided. Further, state law requires cities to ensure there is <br />an adequate supply of industrial land anytime they take actions (such as zone changes or <br />comprehensive plan amendments)to reduce that inventory. <br /> <br />Given the vague language of this bill, staff would recommend opposing it until further <br />clarification can be provided. <br /> <br /> <br />HB 2358 <br /> <br />Relating Clause: Relating to preferences in public project construction for products produced within the <br />United States; declaring an emergency. <br /> <br />Title: Prohibits contracting agency from awarding contract for public improvement or public <br />works unless iron, steel, wood products and manufactured goods, including equipment, <br />used in public improvement or public works are produced within United States. <br /> <br />Sponsored by: Introduced and printed pursuant to House Rule 12.00. Presession filed (at the request of <br />House Interim Committee on Business and Labor) <br /> <br />URL: http://www.leg.state.or.us/11reg/measpdf/hb2300.dir/hb2358.intro.pdf <br /> <br />Contact Respondent Dept Updated Priority Recommendation <br />Jamie Garner CS-FIN 01/14/2011 Pri 2 Oppose <br /> <br />Comments: Combining the potential 25% increase in materials and equipment with the administrative <br />time that would be required by the City to verify this for every PI or PW project makes <br />this seem like an incredibly costly proposition that, as Mike and Paul said, is well- <br />intentioned but coming at the wrong time when budgets have been significantly <br />tightened. The City should oppose this bill because the implications could quite possibly <br />limit the amount of projects the City could afford to take on. <br /> <br />Contact Respondent Dept Updated Priority Recommendation <br />Mike Penwell CS-FAC 01/19/2011 Pri 2 Oppose <br /> <br />Comments: While this bill is well-intentioned, experience with stimulus projects have "Buy <br />American" requirements has demonstrated that it's often difficult to obtain material and <br />equipment--especially for buildings--that meet the requirements, and it raises the overall <br />cost of the project significantly. <br /> <br />This bill would also limit access to a multitude of cutting-edge technologies and energy- <br />efficient products coming out of Europe and the Pacific Rim. <br /> <br />Contact Respondent Dept Updated Priority Recommendation <br />Eric Jones PW-ADM 01/21/2011 -- -- <br /> <br />Comments: Defer to Paul Klope. <br />8 <br /> <br /> <br />