Laserfiche WebLink
Contact Respondent Dept Updated Priority Recommendation <br />Susan Mullett CS-HR 01/24/2011 Pri 1 Oppose <br /> <br />Comments: Too restrictive. Would have an impact on departments in the City that use temporary <br />employees. This impact would require change in business plans, cutting services or <br />increase in program costs to the public. Currently the City already has guidelines for <br />temporary employees and many are within the 1040 hours. <br /> <br />Contact Respondent Dept Updated Priority Recommendation <br />Mike Magee LRCS-ADM 01/20/2011 Pri 1 Oppose <br /> <br />Comments: This bill would require LRCS to significantly change the way we do business and would <br />result in cost increases or program/service reductions. LRCS utilizes temporary <br />employees to staff programs and services during times of increased activity throughout <br />the year. Many of these employees are high school and college students that need to have <br />flexible schedules to meet their study obligations. As an example, in our Aquatics <br />programs, temporary staff have been certified and trained to provide unique skills such as <br />lifeguarding as well as swim and water fitness instructing. Other services that could be <br />affected include LRCS facility front desk positions, before and after school program care <br />providers, and specialty class and program leaders. <br /> <br />While some of our temporary employees do work less than six calendar months in a <br />twelve month period, many do work more than that while still remaining under the <br />current 1040 hours per year limit. By making the definition of a temporary employee <br />more restrictive, LRCS would have to hire, train and terminate new temporary staff every <br />six months, hire more regular staff at a significantly increased cost to the City, reduce the <br />capacity of programs based on existing regular staff without using significant temporary <br />employees, and/or cut back on the number of programs/services enabling us to use our <br />existing regular staff. <br /> <br />Because of the significant impacts, LRCS opposes this bill unless the definition is <br />changed to incorporate employees who work 1040 hours or less in a calendar year. <br />However, since this affects all temporary employees in the City, we will defer to HR, as <br />the City’s lead on this bill, if they have a differing opinion. <br /> <br /> <br />HB 2586 <br /> <br />Relating Clause: Relating to the application of prevailing wage rates to enterprise zones; declaring an <br />emergency. <br /> <br />Title: Classifies exemption from ad valorem property taxation as funds of public agency for <br />purpose of requiring payment of prevailing rate of wage. <br /> <br />Sponsored by: By Representative SCHAUFLER; Representative MATTHEWS (Presession filed.) <br /> <br />URL: http://www.leg.state.or.us/11reg/measpdf/hb2500.dir/hb2586.intro.pdf <br /> <br />Contact Respondent Dept Updated Priority Recommendation <br />Larry Hill CS-FIN 01/20/2011 Pri 3 Oppose <br /> <br />19 <br /> <br /> <br />