Laserfiche WebLink
allowing smoking indoors only for purposes of "sampling" and would address <br />"loopholes" found in both the City code and State law. <br /> <br /> <br />HB 2742 <br /> <br />Relating Clause: Relating to crime; appropriating money. <br /> <br />Title: Requires persons who commit certain crimes against animals to register with law <br />enforcement agencies. <br /> <br />Sponsored by: By Representative BOONE <br /> <br />URL: http://www.leg.state.or.us/11reg/measpdf/hb2700.dir/hb2742.intro.pdf <br /> <br />Contact Respondent Dept Updated Priority Recommendation <br />Chuck Tilby EPD-ADM 01/24/2011 Pri 2 Oppose <br /> <br />Comments: Requires City police department to intake registration information, photograph and <br />fingerprint people who are sent to us. Photographing and fingerprinting is a rather lengthy <br />process and is more appropriately conducted by a Sheriff's Office (who run correctional <br />facilities). This process is essentially the same as sex offender registrations. We must <br />have a Detective process the photographing and fingerprinting because records personnel <br />are not trained to conduct activities. We are, therefore, diverting detective work to a <br />regulatory activity more appropriately conducted by Parole and Probation. We do have <br />the benefit of learning more about the offender with a detective involvement. In the case <br />of animal abusers, there is no such benefit. Also, their photograph is less likely to be our <br />offender database because they are lower level offenders to begin with. If we assume that <br />there will be as many animal offenders sent to us as there are sex offenders, the work to <br />process them is more than double because of the requirement to photograph. In addition, <br />the State Police will assess a fee of $70 to the individual for the relatively minor impact <br />of managing the program. However, there is no provision to reimburse local agencies for <br />doing the work of the state police in processing registrants. <br /> <br /> <br />HB 2743 <br /> <br />Relating Clause: Relating to podiatric physicians. <br /> <br />Title: Adds podiatric physician and surgeon to definition of “attending physician” for purposes <br />of workers’ compensation law. <br /> <br />Sponsored by: By Representative BOONE (at the request of Oregon Podiatric Medical Association) <br /> <br />URL: http://www.leg.state.or.us/11reg/measpdf/hb2700.dir/hb2743.intro.pdf <br /> <br />Contact Respondent Dept Updated Priority Recommendation <br />Jamie Iboa CS-RS 01/18/2011 -- Monitor <br /> <br />32 <br /> <br /> <br />