My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 3: Ratification of Unanimous IGR Actions and Action on Non-Unanimous IGR Actions
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2011
>
CC Agenda - 02/28/11 Meeting
>
Item 3: Ratification of Unanimous IGR Actions and Action on Non-Unanimous IGR Actions
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/25/2011 11:42:31 AM
Creation date
2/25/2011 11:07:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
2/28/2011
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
201
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Comments: Support and monitor. Red flags: I did not see a provision that disallows local vehicle <br />rental fees; however, that would be a major red flag to look for. Also, very broad <br />enabling clause. <br /> <br />In general, defer to Larry Hill's analysis. At a quick read, it seems like the City would <br />support this bill because the additional revenue from the proposed motor vehicle rental <br />tax would go to the State Highway Trust Fund and be allocated per existing formula (i.e., <br />the City of Eugene would get a portion of the new revenue). <br /> <br /> <br />HB 2561 <br /> <br />Relating Clause: Relating to financial institutions. <br /> <br />Title: Directs public officials to deposit public funds in certain community banks. <br /> <br />Sponsored by: Introduced and printed pursuant to House Rule 12.00. Presession filed (at the request of <br />House Interim Committee on Revenue) <br /> <br />URL: http://www.leg.state.or.us/11reg/measpdf/hb2500.dir/hb2561.intro.pdf <br /> <br />Contact Respondent Dept Updated Priority Recommendation <br />Twylla Miller CS-FIN 1/24/2011 Pri 2 Oppose <br /> <br />Comments: I oppose this bill. This bill directs public officials to deposit public funds with community <br />banks if the cost to provide banking services (multiplied by a factor of 0.9) is lower than <br />the cost for services charged by a bank that is not a community bank. <br /> <br />Public entities should have the flexibility to manage their resources and place public <br />funds with banks that are able to provide the unique services needed by the public sector <br />while providing competitive rates. <br /> <br />The City's current depository and primary lending banks are not community banks. It has <br />been our experience that community banks do not have the knowledge base/experience to <br />deal with the unique needs of large public entities. The City's main (depository) bank is <br />selected through an RFP process - through which all banks are eligible to compete for our <br />business. <br /> <br />The bulk of the City’s funds that aren’t otherwise invested are held in the Local <br />Government Investment Pool - managed by the State. Under ORS the allowable balance <br />is about $42M, with unlimited deposits and withdrawals, making the pool a good tool to <br />handle the daily cash flow needs of the City. <br /> <br />While the City could open accounts at several different banks, we do not do so as there is <br />a cost both in staff time & fees to having accounts at several banks. <br /> <br />We do value our community banks and place funds through certificates of deposit via a <br />competitive bid process in which any bank with a presence in Eugene is invited to <br />participate. Local banks usually win such bids as their CD rates are much better than the <br />national banks. <br /> <br />10 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.