Laserfiche WebLink
its water needs. Veneta had investigated its options and found that other options had substantial <br />drawbacks. He suggested a prosperous Veneta benefited the greater region. <br />Tom Slocum, 1950 Graham Drive, believed that Veneta was the first of many communities that would <br />seek water from Eugene. He suggested that in solving its own problem, Veneta could help Eugene to <br />solve its problem of securing a third water right. He anticipated that there would be considerable <br />competition for future rights, and if EWEB did not use enough of the rights assigned to it, there was a <br />chance an entity other than EWEB would be making decisions about who had access to the water in the <br />future. <br />Ron Farmer, no address given, supported the Veneta water contract. He said that the courts would make <br />the final decision about who had authority over the sale, and that would provide clarity about the process <br />to follow as the two communities went forward and worked together for the success of their citizens. He <br />believed Eugene citizens supported a cooperative approach to the issue. <br />Gary Wildish, no address given, termed the contract a great opportunity for Eugene to perfect its water <br />rights. Speaking to the topic of communities, he pointed out that Oregon communities had limited <br />resources and were working together to do things in more cost - effective ways. Regional solutions were <br />being contemplated throughout the state. He believed that cooperation with Veneta was consistent with <br />what Eugene was already doing. He termed the contract an opportunity for a "win -win" solution. <br />Tabitha Ech, 24865 Strike Street, Veneta, owner of Our Daily Bread Restaurant in Veneta, said she <br />bought her business in 2006 and economic conditions had worsened since than. There was not enough <br />water to sustain Veneta, much less grow Veneta into becoming the small community that its residents <br />desired. She said there were also health and safety issues to consider. She hoped more businesses joined <br />her in the future to make Veneta a vibrant community for all to enjoy. <br />Thomas Cotter, 88098 Hester Street, Veneta, an incoming Veneta councilor, spoke in support of the sale <br />of water to Veneta. He said the contract would allow Veneta to grow and contribute to welfare of the <br />area. He pointed out that Oregon law required Veneta to ensure it could provide residents with water, and <br />because of limited ground water resources, the contract could provide that service. Veneta was a <br />responsible and growing community that wanted the same resources afforded to other nearby communi- <br />ties. He asked the council to support the contract. <br />Craig Soderberg, 87965 Sherwood Street, Veneta, supported the proposed water contract. He said <br />EWEB's agreement to provide water to Veneta was an example of how two organizations could work <br />together toward a mutually beneficial solution. He suggested the contract was also an example of being a <br />good neighbor. He said he served on the Veneta Park Board, and water was crucial to Veneta's ability to <br />take care of its current parks, along with helping Veneta to provide more parks and open spaces. He <br />expressed concern that without the contract, Veneta would lack the water needed to fight local fires. He <br />said access to a secure water supply would allow Veneta to be more independent and help give it more <br />opportunities for local employment. <br />Carrie Connelly, 975 Oak Street, Suite 975, Veneta City Attorney, submitted her written testimony <br />speaking to whether the proposal comported with existing Oregon, County, and local land use law. <br />Mayor Piercy closed the public hearing. She thanked those who offered testimony. <br />MINUTES— Eugene City Council December 13, 2010 Page 10 <br />Regular Meeting <br />