Laserfiche WebLink
a number of advantages in that it fostered a walkable, vibrant, diverse, dense neighborhood served by bus <br />rapid transit. It would also facilitate a more streamlined, uniform process for those wishing to build in <br />Eugene. <br />Mr. Mason -Gere did not support the last minute change related to the body that heard appeals, which had <br />been made by the Planning Commission. He thought there would be more certainty if such appeals went <br />to the Hearings Official as opposed to the Planning Commission, which was a board of political <br />appointees. He was also concerned about negative impacts on business owners on the south side of <br />Franklin Boulevard by the threat of special setbacks on which one could not build. He asked the council <br />to mitigate that, address the appeals process, and adopt the code. <br />Susie Smith, 1659 Orchard Street, a member of the Walnut Mixed -Use Subcommittee of FAN, shared a <br />"no node" sign from 2003 and acknowledged the process leading to the council's consideration of the <br />Walnut Station WC was a long one. While she thought the process started on a sour note, she believed <br />the outcome was an incredible product of collaboration. She believed the draft plan was getting better <br />with each review and hoped by July 26 it would be "really good." Ms. Smith acknowledged the plan was <br />not perfect and there were problems, but she thought the plan went a long way toward addressing the <br />issues that had been mentioned in testimony. She thought it addressed the edges between the MUC and <br />the neighborhood and expressed support for the proposed evaluation process. Ms. Smith said the <br />neighborhood saw much potential in the plan, including the potential that the multi -way boulevard could <br />be a beautiful entrance into the city. <br />Ms. Smith thanked Project Manager Lydia McKinney and said the project would not have gotten so far <br />without Ms. McKinney's energy and ability to forge consensus through collaboration. <br />Josh Reckord, 1575 Fairmount Boulevard, spoke to the creation of an expectation of graceful transitions <br />from mixed -use to single - family houses. He noted that the term "graceful transition" was found in the <br />plan, but grace could not be asserted and must be demonstrated. He believed that graceful transitions <br />were necessary to satisfy those who participated in the planning process as well as to demonstrate the <br />viability of such projects to others in the community as the City contemplated additional mixed -use <br />centers. <br />Mr. Reckord believed the City needed to commit ongoing resources of time and money to the planning <br />process to overcome residents' resistance to change. He suggested implementation would be key to the <br />success of the MUC. How that occurred would set the stage for moving forward. He suggested that <br />resources be used to assess both the process and the products that resulted. <br />David Sonnichsen, 2435 Skyline Boulevard, supported the multi -way boulevard, terming it vital to FAN's <br />support of the Walnut Station MUC. He said a smooth flow of motorized vehicles using a new Franklin <br />Boulevard friendly to both local and pass- through users, augmented by mass transit, would unite parts of <br />the neighborhood now divided by Franklin Boulevard. Much of the "knitting" would be created by <br />alternative modes. He said that the boulevard would make crossing Franklin more inviting and would <br />promote access to the Millrace riparian corridor and Willamette River because of the stepped down height <br />limits. <br />Camilla Bayliss, 1621 Fairmount Boulevard, spoke to the need for the parking policies recommended by <br />staff and noted the increase in parking problems as the University of Oregon grew and the neighborhood <br />increased in density. The neighborhood succeeded in getting recognition from the UO of the impact of <br />parking spillover problems from UO events. She cited examples of some problems created by those <br />MINUTES— Eugene City Council June 21, 2010 Page 5 <br />Public Hearing <br />