My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC Minutes - 06/16/10 Work Session
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Minutes
>
2010
>
CC Minutes - 06/16/10 Work Session
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/23/2012 11:45:50 AM
Creation date
2/28/2011 3:36:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Minutes
Meeting_Type
Work Session
CMO_Meeting_Date
6/16/2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ms. Ortiz had also not been able to attend all three days, but had attended the first day. She agreed that it <br />had been a good exercise, though the cost for the consultant gave her pause. She observed that she had been <br />the only person of color present on the day she was there. She also had not seen anyone present who could <br />not afford to take time off work to be there. She had heard Mr. Chadwick remark that the people who were <br />interested and counted were there and she took offense at this. She averred that there were a number of <br />people in the community who could not afford to participate in this type of process. She was looking <br />forward to receiving the information from the workshop. She did believe that any time people could spend <br />time talking with one another, they could not go too far wrong. <br />Mr. Pryor felt that Ms. Ortiz had a valid point. He commented that finding out how to reach everyone they <br />wanted to reach had plagued researchers "forever." For him what was significant was whether the future <br />would be like a car where the driver would take hands off the wheel and it would just go where it would go <br />or they would put their hands on the wheel and steer it. He was concerned that people were trying to take <br />the future in two different directions and this could lead to the wrong result and each side blaming the other <br />for it. He said everyone needed to work together and the workshop was one way to gain this kind of unity. <br />He averred that Mr. Chadwick had done a good job with the people who had been at the workshop, but they <br />needed to be able to explain to the rest of the population why the community should be deliberate about its <br />planning for growth and the future so there was more consensus. <br />Mayor Piercy remarked that this was an iterative process because there would be people who had been "on <br />part of the journey and had not been with it all along." <br />Ms. Gardner said they wanted to leverage the synergy from the workshop. She related that the people who <br />were present had come away with their stereotypes about certain people dispelled and some had even <br />indicated that they would actively work to refute those stereotypes. She averred that there had been <br />considerable knowledge, expertise, and leadership at the workshop. She commented that at the end of the <br />workshop there had been stated commitments by participants to being part of the solution and to working <br />toward the best outcomes. She stated that staff thought the summer would provide a good opportunity to <br />work intensively with the group and subsets of the group. She said they might need to expand the group for <br />representation and invited the councilors to provide recommendations. <br />Carolyn Weiss, planning staff, related that the community group was excited to work together and had <br />shown a commitment to the project. She said staff believed that over the next few months they could work <br />with this group to refine the data and hone in on a draft scenario for how Eugene might grow in the future. <br />She stated that this was good timing as they could start back -up with public workshops and broader <br />community engagement to garner feedback on the work that had been done over the summer. She reviewed <br />three elements of the approach they were taking: community consensus, technical analysis, and continued <br />work with the consultant Eco- Northwest. She acknowledged the concern expressed at the table that they <br />might pinpoint a certain time 20 years from the present and believe that would be where the community <br />would end up. She called this the "jaws of uncertainty discussion." She explained that staff had been in <br />conversation with the State about how much flexibility they could build into the plan. She said if this <br />approach did not move the process forward, they could revert to a more conventional approach. She added <br />that they wanted to include regional partners, such as the county, in the process and they believed this would <br />lead to an expedited adoption process once they had reached that point. <br />Mayor Piercy understood that they had joint meetings with the Planning Commission and members of the <br />Sustainability and Human Rights commissions participating, but she wanted to ensure that they were <br />utilizing them as commissions to make use of what they could do to help move the process along. She knew <br />that 1,000 Friends of Oregon was becoming more "active in this area" and had participated in the Portland <br />planning process. She thought it might be better to "invite them in early" as full participants and encouraged <br />MINUTES— Eugene City Council June 16, 2010 Page 2 <br />Work Session <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.