My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 2A: Approval of City Council Minutes
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2011
>
CC Agenda - 03/14/11 Meeting
>
Item 2A: Approval of City Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2011 2:06:12 PM
Creation date
3/11/2011 10:17:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
3/14/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />ATTACHMENT A <br />M I N U T E S <br /> <br />Eugene City Council <br />Council Chamber—City Hall <br />777 Pearl Street—Eugene, Oregon <br /> <br />January 24, 2011 <br />7:30 p.m. <br /> <br />COUNCILORS PRESENT: Betty Taylor, George Brown, Andrea Ortiz, George Poling, Mike Clark, <br />Alan Zelenka, Chris Pryor, Pat Farr. <br /> <br /> <br />Her Honor Mayor Kitty Piercy called the January 24, 2011, regular meeting of the Eugene City Council <br />to order. <br /> <br /> <br />1. PUBLIC FORUM <br /> <br />Mayor Piercy reviewed the rules of the Public Forum. <br /> <br />Jim Hale <br />, 1715 Linnea Avenue, opposed the proposed City income tax for schools because he believed it <br />would harm business in Eugene and because school funding was a State responsibility. He believed a <br />City income tax surcharge would be regressive in nature, but acknowledged that not adopting the <br />surcharge approach would make the tax more complex and expensive to collect. Mr. Hale suggested that <br />such a tax would take pressure off the legislature to act on behalf of the schools. He said the true purpose <br />of the proposed tax was not clear; some argued about the need for haste to take advantage of voter <br />discontent over school closures while others were concerned about layoffs and school instructional days. <br />Mr. Hale said that many of those who would benefit from such a tax would not pay it and many who <br />would pay it would not benefit. He urged the council to place pressure on the State to fund education. <br /> <br />th <br />Jack Meacham <br />, 2663 West 28 Avenue, expressed support for the West Eugene EmX extension. He <br />termed it a visionary project that would alleviate future congestion in West Eugene and help <br />accommodate population growth. Many citizens of Eugene, including low-wage employees, would have <br />th <br />to rely on public transportation in the future because of the costs of cars. He predicted that West 11 <br />Avenue would see an increase in sales and employment as a result of EmX. <br /> <br />Donna DeForest <br />, 3575 Westwood Ho Avenue, Bethel Stand for Children, reported her organization <br />formally supported the proposed income tax for schools at its last meeting. She emphasized the <br />importance of adequate education funding to close the achievement gap. She asked the council to place <br />an income tax measure for education on the May 2011 ballot to avoid a shortened school year and <br />increased class sizes. She did not think State government would increase school funding anytime soon. <br />In the meantime, the achievement gap would grow. <br /> <br />Pete Mandrapa <br />, 4120 West Amazon Street, supported the proposed income tax for schools. He urged <br />the council to place a measure on the May 2011 ballot and to make the tax as progressive as possible. In <br />his view, a progressive tax was a tax on those residents making more than $50,000. He believed that if <br />the City waited until November 2011 it would mean massive teacher layoffs. <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council January 24, 2010 Page 1 <br /> Regular Meeting <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.