Laserfiche WebLink
Comments: Agree with Stephanie. Excellent idea that removes a disincentive to providing services to <br />homeless people. <br />HB 3262 <br />Relating Clause: Relating to prevention, treatment and recovery tax; appropriating money; prescribing an <br />effective date; providing for revenue raising that requires approval by a three-fifths <br />majority. <br />Title:Imposes prevention, treatment and recovery tax on malt beverages. <br />Sponsored by: By COMMITTEE ON REVENUE <br />URL:http://www.leg.state.or.us/11reg/measpdf/hb3200.dir/hb3262.intro.pdf <br />Contact Respondent Dept Updated Priority Recommendation <br />Larry Hill CS-FIN 2/18/2011 Pri 1 Oppose <br /> <br />Comments: Oppose unless significantly amended to protect cities' and counties' shares of malt liquor <br />revenue. HB 3262 is unnecessary, complex and could reduce state shared revenue <br />received by the City of Eugene. The bill would revise the state malt beverages tax. The <br />proposed tax rate is blank in the bill as introduced, and the shares to be distributed to <br />cities and counties are also blank, so the impact of the bill on state shared revenue cannot <br />yet be determined. The bill also layers a new distribution scheme on top of the existing <br />statutory distributions for malt beverage tax revenue. Instead this bill, the state could <br />simply appropriate the 56% share it already gets from the existing malt beverage tax for <br />the State Police and alcohol remediation services, leaving city and county shares intact. <br />What is apparent to me is that this bill intends to steer significant malt beverage tax <br />revenue to a new Alcohol Remediation fund and to the State Police away from counties <br />and cities. <br />The existing state tax on malt beverages is $2.60 per barrel. The revenue from the <br />existing tax is currently distributed according to statute: 56% to the state general fund; <br />20% to cities based on shares of incorporated population; 10% to counties based on <br />population; and 14% to cities based on a complex formula. HB 3262 would circumvent <br />this established distribution formula for malt beverage revenues. Note: HB 3262 would <br />not affect wine or liquor revenues, which are not included in the measures proposed <br />changes. In FY11 the City of Eugene projects it will receive $3,510,000 from malt <br />beverage, wine and liquor tax revenues collected by the state. A significant share of this <br />is derived from taxes on malt beverages, but I cannot as yet determine the exact share. <br />HB 3305 <br />Relating Clause: Relating to county property tax collections. <br />Title:Directs counties to recover costs of property assessment and tax collection from taxing <br />districts. <br />10 <br />