Laserfiche WebLink
URL: <br />http://www.leg.state.or.us/11reg/measpdf/sb0800.dir/sb0816.intro.pdf <br />Contact Respondent Dept Updated Priority Recommendation <br />Chuck Tilby EPD-ADM 2/24/2011 Pri 2 Support <br /> <br />Comments: Seems identical to SB 0803. This bill fills a hole in current law exposed by a court <br />decision. Currently, someone who just views child pornography, but does not save the <br />file in any way, commits no crime. This makes it a crime to view the file. <br />SB 0823 <br />Relating Clause: <br />Relating to tax credits for affordable housing lenders; prescribing an effective date. <br />Title: <br />Extends sunset for tax credit for affordable housing lenders. <br />Sponsored by: <br />By COMMITTEE ON FINANCE AND REVENUE <br />URL: <br />http://www.leg.state.or.us/11reg/measpdf/sb0800.dir/sb0823.intro.pdf <br />Contact Respondent Dept Updated Priority Recommendation <br />Amanda Nobel Flannery S. Jennings PDD-ADM 2/24/2011 Pri 3 Support <br /> <br />Comments: This bill matches SB 0900. The bill extends another source of subsidy for affordable <br />housing that works in concert with other state and local sources. This resource will help <br />the City reach the goals set forth under Envision Eugene. <br />SB 0884 <br />Relating Clause: <br />Relating to state finance; prescribing an effective date. <br />Title: <br />Repeals Ballot Measure 66 (2010). <br />Sponsored by: <br />By Senator OLSEN; Senators TELFER, THOMSEN, Representatives CONGER, <br />PARRISH <br />URL: <br />http://www.leg.state.or.us/11reg/measpdf/sb0800.dir/sb0884.intro.pdf <br />Contact Respondent Dept Updated Priority Recommendation <br />Larry Hill CS-FIN 2/23/2011 Pri 1 Oppose <br /> <br />Comments: SB 884 would repeal both Measure 66 and 67. The bill would also significantly lower <br />income taxes for upper-income taxpayers and corporations. It would reduce state revenue <br />significantly. While it would not directly impact the City of Eugene, the necessary <br />reductions in state funding for the universities, schools and a range of state services <br />would have an adverse effect on the city. <br />22 | Page <br />March 9, 2011 IGR Committee Meeting <br />