My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 3: Ratification of Unanimous IGR Actions and Action on Non-Unanimous IGR Actions
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2011
>
CC Agenda - 03/14/11 Meeting
>
Item 3: Ratification of Unanimous IGR Actions and Action on Non-Unanimous IGR Actions
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2011 2:07:11 PM
Creation date
3/11/2011 1:42:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
3/14/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
47
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
some Public Works operations additional idling restrictions may have a negative impact <br />on operational efficiencies. <br />HB 3081 <br />Relating Clause: Relating to discrimination in public contracting; declaring an emergency. <br />Title:Prohibits contracting agency from awarding public contract to prospective contractor that <br />discriminates in providing employee benefits between employee that has domestic <br />partner and employee that has spouse. <br />Sponsored by: By Representative HUNT <br />URL:http://www.leg.state.or.us/11reg/measpdf/hb3000.dir/hb3081.intro.pdf <br />Contact Respondent Dept Updated Priority Recommendation <br />Emmy Jenson CS-CMO 2/4/2011 Pri 3 Support <br /> <br />Comments: Concur with Mike Penwell. Additional comments: the City has a long history of <br />supporting domestic partnerships and providing employee domestic partnership benefits. <br />City purchasing policies need to consistently reflect our commitment to domestic <br />partnership and anti-discrimination practices. <br />Contact Respondent Dept Updated Priority Recommendation <br />Jenifer Willer PWE 2/3/2011 -- -- <br /> <br />Comments: I defer to others on a recommendation for this bill. <br />Contact Respondent Dept Updated Priority Recommendation <br />Paul Klope PWE 2/2/2011 -- -- <br /> <br />Comments: I will defer to others on this bill. <br />Contact Respondent Dept Updated Priority Recommendation <br />Jerry Lidz CS-CMO-ATTY 2/13/2011 Pri 3 Support <br /> <br />Comments: I agree with Mike Penwell's comments. Implementing and enforcing the new contracting <br />requirements, however, will take time and cost some money. I think City policy is that <br />those are worthwhile costs, but we should be aware that the changes have a (relatively <br />small) price. <br />Contact Respondent Dept Updated Priority Recommendation <br />Jamie Garner CS-FIN 2/4/2011 Pri 3 Support <br /> <br />Comments: I agree with Mike Penwell’s analysis/comments. <br />Contact Respondent Dept Updated Priority Recommendation <br />Mike Penwell CS-FAC 2/4/2011 Pri 3 Support <br /> <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.