My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC Minutes - 01/24/11 Meeting
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Minutes
>
2011
>
CC Minutes - 01/24/11 Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/23/2012 11:27:55 AM
Creation date
3/15/2011 2:44:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Minutes
Meeting_Type
Meeting
CMO_Meeting_Date
1/24/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />Eugene City Council <br />Council Chamber —City Hall <br />777 Pearl Street — Eugene, Oregon <br />January 24, 2011 <br />7:30 p.m. <br />COUNCILORS PRESENT: Betty Taylor, George Brown, Andrea Ortiz, George Poling, Mike Clark, <br />Alan Zelenka, Chris Pryor, Pat Farr. <br />Her Honor Mayor Kitty Piercy called the January 24, 2011, regular meeting of the Eugene City Council <br />to order. <br />1. PUBLIC FORUM <br />Mayor Piercy reviewed the rules of the Public Forum. <br />Jim Hale, 1715 Linnea Avenue, opposed the proposed City income tax for schools because he believed it <br />would harm business in Eugene and because school funding was a State responsibility. He believed a <br />City income tax surcharge would be regressive in nature, but acknowledged that not adopting the <br />surcharge approach would make the tax more complex and expensive to collect. Mr. Hale suggested that <br />such a tax would take pressure off the legislature to act on behalf of the schools. He said the true purpose <br />of the proposed tax was not clear; some argued about the need for haste to take advantage of voter <br />discontent over school closures while others were concerned about layoffs and school instructional days. <br />Mr. Hale said that many of those who would benefit from such a tax would not pay it and many who <br />would pay it would not benefit. He urged the council to place pressure on the State to fund education. <br />Jack Meacham, 2663 West 28` Avenue, expressed support for the West Eugene EmX extension. He <br />termed it a visionary project that would alleviate future congestion in West Eugene and help <br />accommodate population growth. Many citizens of Eugene, including low -wage employees, would have <br />to rely on public transportation in the future because of the costs of cars. He predicted that West 11 "' <br />Avenue would see an increase in sales and employment as a result of EmX. <br />Donna DeForest, 3575 Westwood Ho Avenue, Bethel Stand for Children, reported her organization <br />formally supported the proposed income tax for schools at its last meeting. She emphasized the <br />importance of adequate education funding to close the achievement gap. She asked the council to place <br />an income tax measure for education on the May 2011 ballot to avoid a shortened school year and <br />increased class sizes. She did not think State government would increase school funding anytime soon. <br />In the meantime, the achievement gap would grow. <br />Pete Mandrapa, 4120 West Amazon Street, supported the proposed income tax for schools. He urged <br />the council to place a measure on the May 2011 ballot and to make the tax as progressive as possible. In <br />his view, a progressive tax was a tax on those residents making more than $50,000. He believed that if <br />the City waited until November 2011 it would mean massive teacher layoffs. <br />MINUTES — Eugene City Council January 24, 2011 Page 1 <br />Regular Meeting <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.