My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC Minutes - 01/24/11 Meeting
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Minutes
>
2011
>
CC Minutes - 01/24/11 Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/23/2012 11:27:55 AM
Creation date
3/15/2011 2:44:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Minutes
Meeting_Type
Meeting
CMO_Meeting_Date
1/24/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Steve Wilson, 4549 Souza Street, averred that the lack of mention of family and schools in the council's <br />on -line biographies suggested a disconnection between the council and the public it served. He said that <br />"Eugene has been busy being recognized for art enhancements" and suggested that "renaissance" had <br />been at the expense of school system and was in direct conflict with the ideals of community families. He <br />suggested the City could now "rest on its laurels" in regard to those efforts and instead work to create a <br />learning environment for students to be educated enough to appreciate the art "created during this <br />renaissance." Mr. Wilson wanted the State's lottery money to be reallocated to schools. He preferred to <br />manage existing funds as opposed to giving government more money. However, he thought an income <br />tax would acceptable if was fair. <br />Wendy Butler - Boyesen, 1265 City View, supported the proposed City income tax for schools. She also <br />expressed her support of the West Eugene EmX extension. She shared information about comparative <br />corridor operating costs given to her by LTD in support of her contention that the West Eugene EmX <br />extension was cost - effective in comparison to the no -build option. Ms. Butler - Boyesen praised the <br />existing EmX system for its ease of use. <br />Elaine Replogue, 2847 Martinique Avenue, favored a progressive income tax to be placed on the May <br />ballot to restore lost school days, restore curriculum cuts, retain teachers, and decrease class sizes. She <br />emphasized the importance of appealing to residents without children in the schools. She herself did not <br />want to continue with public education if it was to be at the expense of her children. Ms. Replogue said <br />Eugene could not wait for the State to act. She advocated for all residents with higher incomes to be <br />taxed more to give Eugene children a better education. <br />Marilyn Leer, North Shasta Loop, expressed support for a fair and equitable tax to support education. <br />She said that many of retired citizens would not be paying any of the tax because of the PERS system. <br />She believed if some retirees were to be exempted from the tax, the City needed to exempt all retirees, or <br />find another way to fund the schools, which she would favor. She was concerned about the fairness of the <br />tax being proposed and asked that it be made equitable for all. <br />Phil Barnhart, Eugene, a State representative, reported that the State of Oregon had collected a tax for <br />education on behalf of Multnomah County and had the authority to enter into a similar agreement with <br />Eugene to collect a tax. Representative Barnhart said he had been working on the issue of school funding <br />since the 1990s without much success, and maintained that the State of Oregon would not fit the problem <br />anytime soon. He had done everything he knew how and had not been successful in reversing the <br />direction of State budget cuts. He said Eugene could help only its own students. He emphasized the <br />importance of a good education for Oregon students and for the sake of economy in general, and <br />recommended the council refer an income tax proposal to the voters to support local schools. <br />Casey Drobnick, 1475 East 15` Avenue, a University of Oregon student, supported the West Eugene <br />EmX expansion. She said it would reduce road congestion and pollution on West I I d ' Avenue because <br />vehicles would run in dedicated lanes. People would not have to spend their money on rising gas prices. <br />She maintained EmX was a business investment and had been more successful than predicted. She <br />believed more people would ride the system when it was expanded. EmX would take cars off the road, <br />improve the environment, and be better for businesses along the corridor. <br />Hillary Johnson, Eugene, Stand for Children, expressed support for the subcommittee process that led to <br />development of the proposal for an income tax for schools. She supported the proposed measure and <br />wanted to see it on the May 2011 ballot. She also asked that the tax be made retroactive to January 2011. <br />MINUTES — Eugene City Council January 24, 2011 Page 3 <br />Regular Meeting <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.