Laserfiche WebLink
Ms. Hutson said that 90 percent of those in attendance at the recent public hearing regarding the system <br />had indicated opposition to the proposal to run EmX down West I V Avenue. She asked the council to <br />take that into consideration. <br />Josef Siekiel - Zdzienicki, 1025 Taylor Street, supported a temporary City income tax for schools with a <br />lower threshold. He suggested that people with lower incomes had more children and should also pay the <br />tax. <br />Mr. Siekiel - Zdzienicki suggested that an Environmental Impact Statement done for both the West 6"'/7"' <br />avenue and West 13` avenue options, and that the route be discussed as part of the Envision Eugene <br />process. He expressed disappointment in the most recent Envision Eugene open house and said that after <br />a year of work, not much information had come out. Mr. Siekiel - Zdzienicki suggested that owners of <br />properties along existing transportation corridors should have been surveyed about what they wanted to <br />do with their property and what they wanted in the form of transportation. He thought that would have <br />saved money and discussion. <br />Steve Robinson, 1755 Tabor Street, submitted and reviewed his written submission in support of the <br />school tax because of the positive economic impact it would have on the community. <br />Mayor Piercy closed the Public Forum. <br />Councilor Taylor agreed with Mr. Robinson about the positive benefit of the proposed tax. She <br />emphasized that the council was not imposing an income tax, but instead was considering whether to give <br />the public an opportunity to vote on such a tax. She believed that small class sizes were crucial to a good <br />education. She said even if residents did not have children they were affected by the educational system. <br />She supported sending the tax to the voters in May 2011. <br />Councilor Ortiz thanked those who offered testimony. She said she had been unable to attend the recent <br />hearing on the proposed EmX extension but had viewed the hearing later. Speaking to the remarks of Mr. <br />White, Councilor Ortiz recalled that she got involved in local politics because of the Martin Luther King, <br />Jr. street renaming controversy and had wanted to contribute to greater understanding of the issue. She <br />urged others to get similarly involved. <br />Councilor Clark also thanked those who offered testimony. He said that people who supported education <br />differed on the best approach to funding. <br />Councilor Pryor agreed with Councilor Taylor about the nature of the decision before the council. He <br />believed it was appropriate to let the voters decide on such a tax. In regard to the appropriate election <br />date, he said that he had to take the remarks of the superintendents about that topic seriously. He believed <br />in a temporary tax that was broadly based and if the council was able to resolve the structure of the tax in <br />a satisfactory manner, he was willing to place such a tax before the voters. <br />Councilor Zelenka thanked those who testified. He emphasized the importance of quality schools and <br />education. He supported letting the voters decide on an income tax because it was about the future and <br />children. The schools were important in recruiting new businesses and the tax would be good for jobs <br />and the economy. It would be a net economic benefit in terms of jobs. He said the legislature would not <br />fix the problem soon. He applauded those who planned to work to pass the tax and hoped for their <br />success. <br />MINUTES— Eugene City Council February 14, 2010 Page 6 <br />Regular Meeting <br />