1912-03-11-1915-02-23.tif - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

on this June 16, 1913, and the ayes and nays were called; CouneiLnen voting aye Johnson, Koppe, Ho}A~rp~ey, Dorr, Bell and Striker, nay none, .absent Hensil! .._and Bea~. l,~otion was .-.r. ade~, :~econded and carried that the City Attorney be instructed to insert a gx~.aranty clau_se in ~11 contracts for pavenent requiring of the contr~ctor a ~arantee that the pavement will with-stand gll ordinary usage for a period of five years. Engineer Forneri reconn~iended that the 20 per cent held back on West l!th and East 8th Street paving contracts be released to the contractors and the Street Co~mittee reported that the work w~s done to their satisfaction and the A.~gineer inst',ue'ted to submit bills for the exact amount due contractors on ti~e~e streets at the next meeting. A request Of Battle and Sv~eeney for grade line of sidewalk at llth and Pearl Streets where they are. erecting an ap[~rt.uent house was referred to the Street Co~mittee, Attorney an~d Engineer to report at the next ~neeting of the Counei!. The ~atter of r_equiring property m~mers to trim t'~ees and hedL~es extending over the walks in various placed of the 0it¥ was turned over to Officer E. C. Cole ._~or his personal attention. Ct~ief of Police was inst~%~eted to continue the notification of property ovmers requiring then to repair or rebuild sidewa_~s where not in proper condition. The City Attorney was instructed to prepare .an Ordinance to protect City pave- n:ent~ agaznst injury by traction enganes Bids for the p~ving of Pearl Street from l~th to 6th Ave~u~e.'s, Oak Street from ~.~,~ ...... otz eet and Mill Street 5th to Vth Avenues, 10th Avenue from Pearl Street to ~'~]] ~' · from lOti~ Average to llth Avenue, and .~pring Boulevard were opened and read, and re-- ferred to the Street ~p~:~.~it'tee for con~ideration and report at the next meeting of Council. Bids for the construction of a sewer on !5th Avenue from Alder to Kiueaid Street~ were <'opened and read, and Cozmei!man Bell moved that the 6'ouneil finds.and determi~les that the b~d of App!ewhite & Stein in the sttm of ~2.70 is the lowest and best bid, and t!~at the contract for the construction of said sewer-be awarded to them in accordance with their bid upon their entering into satisfactory contract,and bond for completion o~. the same, and that tt~e .~,~.ayor and City Recorder be instructed to execute the eontra~t on behalf of the City, and ti~at the other bids got said sewer be rejected and ti~e certified ci~eeks be returned to the bidders. ~;~,otion wa~ seconded and carried.