Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />FAYE HILLS STEWART <br /> <br />Lane County Commissioner <br />East Lane District <br />Faye. Stewart@co.lane.or.us <br /> <br />February 28, 2006 <br />WD bc/fs/06004/T <br /> <br />Mr. Lane Shetterly <br />Department of Land Conservation and Development <br />635 Capitol Street, Suite 150 <br />Salem, OR 97301-2540 <br /> <br />Dear Lane: <br /> <br />The Policy Advisory Board met on February 22, 2006 and posed the following question to you <br />about the Regional Problem Solving process. The text below was recommended to the Board by <br />the Regional Technical Advisory Committee (RTAC). The Policy Board wants assurances from <br />DLCD that the Department will recommend this approach to your commission before proceeding <br />further with the process. Your kind assistance at this critical juncture would be very welcome and <br />appreciated. <br /> <br />Is implementation of the Regional Growth Management Strategy by the 11 local <br />governments voluntary? <br /> <br />1. All participating jurisdictions endorse the Regional Growth Management Strategy, when final, <br />as a tool to help guide growth and development. As part of this endorsement, the 11 local <br />governments will agree to the coordinated population allocations reflected in the Strategy for <br />their jurisdiction. Strategy endorsement and agreement on the population allocations do not <br />involve a land use action at the local level. <br /> <br />2. The only action at the Strategy agreement stage is taken by the Land Conservation and <br />Development Commission (LCDC). The action taken by LCDC will be to find the Strategy in <br />compliance with the intent of the statewide planning goals. Chapter VII of the attached <br />February 14, 2006 Draft Regional Growth Management Strategy contains a list of the <br />applicable Goals and the source of the data to support these findings. <br /> <br />3. Implementation of the "Optional Measures"l in the Strategy, including the use of the Regional <br />Problem Solving (RPS) process, remains voluntarv. This is consistent with the language o.fthe <br /> <br />1 ORS 197.656 states: "(2) Following the procedures set forth in this subsection, the commission may acknowledge <br />amendments to comprehensive plans and land use regulations, or new land use regulations, that do not fully comply <br />. with the rules of the connnission that implement the statewide planning goals, without taking an exception, upon a <br />determination that: <br />(a) The amendments or new provisions are based upon agreements reached by all local participants, the <br />commission and other participating state agencies, in the collaborative regional problem-solving process; <br />(b) The regional problem-solving process has included agreement among the participants on: <br /> <br />PUBLIC SERVICE BUILDING / 125 EAST 8TH AVENUE / EUGENE, OR 97401 / (541) 682-4203 / FAX (541) 682-4616 <br />