Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Ms. Taylor pointed out that possible future acquisitions were not included in the plan and said she was <br />pleased that staff recognized this as a living document. She then turned to the Introduction on page 7 and <br />asked for an explanation of “The feasibility of acquiring farmland”. Ms. Weiss explained there were two <br />projects identified to farmland connections: 1) a greenbelt that would go around the northern side of the city <br />and 2) a working farm as a public open space. <br /> <br />Ms. Taylor turned to page 4, Table 1 and asked for an explanation of “Acquire Amazon Park in holdings <br />along Hilyard Street.” Ms. Weiss explained there were some properties north of Hilyard Community <br />Center and south of Roosevelt Middle School which the City may be interested in acquiring. Ms. Taylor <br />then turned to staff’s notation of “Kincaid Park.” She said that area was not considered a park. Ms. Weiss <br />stated it was considered a park in the City’s inventory and that staff was considering adding additional <br />features to it. <br /> <br />Ms. Taylor asked for an explanation of “Upgrade to Tugman Park.” Ms. Weiss said there have been some <br />improvements made to the play areas; however, additional play area improvements were planned. Ms. <br />Taylor asked for an explanation of “Frank Kinney Park.” Ms. Weiss said there was a Phase II to that plan, <br />primarily trail improvement and stormwater improvements. <br /> <br />Ms. Taylor asked for an explanation of “Upgrade Milton Park.” Ms. Weiss said there was a Phase II plan <br />for improvements to that park. <br /> <br />Ms. Taylor asked for an explanation of “Improving access to Kincaid and Milton Parks.” Ms. Weiss <br />explained the map of those areas illustrates that primarily to the east of Kincaid Park, there was a <br />neighborhood not well served by parks; therefore, some easier connection to reach that park was in the plan. <br /> <br />Mr. Kelly stated he was supportive of the plan before the council. Mr. Kelly referred to the $6 million costs <br />for the first year if the $20 million bond was successful. He questioned the $8 million per year for the <br />remaining years. Ms. Weiss said she would respond fully to that question in writing; however, she noted <br />that the $8 million estimate was projected on future bond measures and potential SDC increases. Mr. Kelly <br />asked that a chart be provided to the council beginning with current conditions and how much each funding <br />source can generate per year to ascertain the trend. He then turned to the information regarding SDCs and <br />said that SDC changes can only be implemented on approved projects and requested that when the plan was <br />adopted, staff ascertain what was included for Park SDCs. <br /> <br />Mr. Pryor said he supported the plan as a “projected” list and asked if there would be a process for a rates <br />committee and public hearings to arrive at a final list that was much more refined based on actual figures <br />rather than projections. Ms. Weiss responded that the growth allocation percentages would not change <br />significantly; however, how they were applied was to be determined. <br /> <br />Mr. Pape? questioned how the “projected” project list and the prioritization result in an equitable geographic <br />plan. Ms. Weiss explained that the revised Table 4 identifies capital costs by planning area which reflects <br />the acquisition development totals for each area and the priority ratings. She explained that the plan strives <br />to provide service to all areas of Eugene and that some new acquisition was targeted for the Willakenzie <br />area. Mr. Pape? voiced a concern that as the plan moves forward, it should be equitable to all areas. He then <br />turned to Page 3, Post Projects and Priorities for Programs and Services – Develop a resource manage- <br />ment plan for existing and new parks. He asked if “resource” has a specific meaning in that concept. Ms. <br />Weiss responded that the word was used to refer to management plans for the City’s existing resources. Ms. <br />Weiss noted that there were funding strategies identified in the PROS that were not currently included in the <br />Project List. <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council February 27, 2006 Page 9 <br /> Work Session <br />