Laserfiche WebLink
<br />th <br />Ms. Laurence shared slides of 8 Avenue, reminding the council it was a designated “Great Street” where <br />people would want to be. The City was implementing the Downtown Plan on a project-by-project basis. <br />She said the Whole Foods project was consistent with the vision and policies outlined in the Downtown Plan. <br /> <br />Ms. Laurence noted the action requested of the council, which was to direct the City Manager to negotiate a <br />land transaction agreement, a development agreement and related legal documents, and to bring all the <br />aforementioned documents to the council for final approval. <br /> <br />Mayor Piercy called for council questions and comments. <br /> <br />Mr. Kelly thought the project was exciting and wanted it to happen. He thought a parking garage would <br />benefit The Shedd’s continued growth as well. He said the store could be built as an outright use on the site <br />in question; the question before the council today was the degree of City participation in the project. <br /> <br />Mr. Kelly suggested another work session be scheduled, given the complexity of the topic. <br /> <br />Mr. Kelly suggested the City needed to get out in front of the issue of downtown green space. He <br />overviewed a proposal for a “green ribbon” connecting the Park Blocks downtown to the river. That <br />proposal would require subgrade parking on the site. Ms. Laurence said staff discussed an enhanced <br />th <br />sidewalk along 8 Avenue using existing right-of-way to create a green walk. Mr. Kelly wanted more <br />council discussion of the subject. <br /> <br />Ms. Ortiz was glad that Mr. Kelly raised the point that the business in question was an outright use. She <br />was concerned about the City providing staff assistance to a particular business when there were other <br />smaller businesses that could also use City help. She had reservations about the City helping some, but not <br />all, businesses. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman did not think the council had adequate time for discussion and agreed that a second work <br />session was needed. She wanted to see a range of options rather than a single option. She was not <br />convinced the proposal was the best investment for the money. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman commended Whole Foods for including embedded parking within its infrastructure. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman concurred with the remarks of Ms. Ortiz, saying that the business in question could go through <br />the normal development process without City assistance. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman said there were several things she would like to see before she could support the project. The <br />first was financial participation from the County and the General Services Administration (GSA) for the <br />project. She did not want to use any City funds outside the district. She believed there were higher <br />priorities for the money; for example, the City could still purchase the riparian area if EWEB decided to <br />move, and the Library Debt Service Fund could be used to offset the library levy. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman wanted to see the parking consolidated and that there be no publicly funded commercial spaces <br />provided. She suggested that the remainder of the City-owned property at the site be sold and the money <br />used to fund the parking structure. Ms. Bettman said the City should share the cost of the utility upgrade <br />with the developer as being commensurate with the benefit offered to the developer. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman believed that if a public parking structure that met a public need was proposed, there should be <br />a competitive bidding process. <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council February 8, 2006 Page 5 <br /> Work Session <br />