My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 5: PH on PROS Project and Priority Plan
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2006
>
CC Agenda - 04/10/06 Meeting
>
Item 5: PH on PROS Project and Priority Plan
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 12:52:22 PM
Creation date
4/6/2006 2:14:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
4/10/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br /> <br />Public Works <br />Engineering <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />City of Eugene <br />MEMORANDUMMEMORANDUM <br />858 Pearl Street <br />Eugene, Oregon 97401 <br />(541) 682-5291 <br />(541) 682-5032 FAX <br />Date: <br />April 4, 2006 <br /> <br />To: <br />Mayor Piercy and City Council <br /> <br />From: <br />Fred McVey, 682-5216 <br /> Engineering Data Services Manager <br /> <br />Subject: Additional Information Related to <br />Preliminary Growth Allocation Figures in the PROS <br /> <br />Project and Priority Plan <br /> <br />In advance of an April 10, 2006 public hearing on the PROS Project and Priorities Plan (Project Plan) <br />staff received a request from Roxie Cuellar of the Home Builders Association of Lane County to make <br />additional information available to the public. This memo and attachment provides additional information <br />and clarification related to growth allocation percentages contained in the Project Plan. Staff had <br />previously provided to the Mayor and City Council clarification of the preliminary growth allocation <br />percentages included in the draft Project Plan as requested in a February 27, 2006 council work session. <br />This clarification was contained in a memo dated March 6, 2006 which was included as Attachment A to <br />the AIS for the public hearing on the Project Plan. <br />Additional information and clarification requested include: <br /> <br />?The estimated acquisition acreage for each individual acquisition project on the project list <br /> <br />?The proposed acreage to be developed for each park project on the proposed project list as well <br />as what part of the project acreage would be set aside as natural area. <br /> <br />?Explanation of why there are no existing deficiencies identified in the growth allocation <br />percentages with respect to neighborhood park land acquisition when Table B-1 of the PROS <br />Comprehensive indicates an existing deficiency for neighborhood parks. <br /> <br />?Explanation of why there are no existing deficiencies identified in the growth allocation <br />percentages with respect to neighborhood park land acquisition when proposed neighborhood <br />parks are to be developed in existing neighborhoods. <br />The estimated acquisition acreage for park land acquisition projects in the Project Plan is provided in the <br />project list spreadsheet attached to this memo as Table A. A clarification is that acres considered in <br />growth allocation percentages include only City-owned parks and facilities; acres in Tables 1 and 2 of the <br />March 6 memo on growth allocation are net of other agency-owned acres. <br />Also provided in Table A attached to this memo is the proposed acreage to be developed for each park <br />project. A requested clarification was to identify portions of future developed parks to be considered <br />April 4, 2006 Memo page 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.