Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />following applies: <br /> 1. The area generating untreated runoff is less than 500 square <br />feet of impervious surface and is isolated from the pollution <br />reduction facility; <br /> 2. The area generating untreated runoff is less than 500 square <br />feet of impervious surface and it is not technically feasible to <br />drain the untreated runoff to the pollution reduction facility; <br /> 3. Constructing pollution reduction facilities to treat the runoff <br />from the area at issue would require removal of trees or <br />damage to other natural resources; or <br /> 4. The area generating untreated runoff is less than 500 square <br />feet of impervious surface and limited access to the area <br />would prevent regular maintenance of the pollution reduction <br />facility. <br />(b) The requirement in EC 9.6792(3)(b) that all pollution reduction <br />facilities be selected from and sited, designed, and constructed <br />according to the pollution reduction provisions and the facility <br />design requirements set forth in the Stormwater Management <br />Manual and that pollution reduction facilities must be designed <br />using one of the methodologies outlined in the Stormwater <br />Management Manual may be adjusted upon finding that all of the <br />following requirements are met: <br /> 1. The proposed alternative design will achieve equal, or <br />superior, results for function (reducing pollution), <br />maintainability and safety, and the proposed siting does not <br />adversely affect structures or other properties. <br /> 2. The applicant’s written description of the proposed <br />alternative design has been reviewed and approved by the <br />City Engineer. The description of the proposed design <br />submitted for review must include all of the following <br />information for each component of the proposed alternative <br />design: <br />a. Size, technical description, capacity, capital cost, <br />design life, construction process and costs, <br />consequences of improper construction, operation <br />and maintenance requirements and costs; <br />b. Data on the effectiveness of proposed alternative <br />technologies, if available, including data from <br />laboratory testing and pilot/full-scale operations, and <br />information regarding the operations of any full-scale <br />installations; <br />c. Any other available information about the proposed <br />design, including peer review articles, scientific or <br />engineering journals, and approvals from other <br /> <br />Ordinance - <br />15 <br />L:\CMO\2006 Council Agendas\M060410\S0604104-attA.doc <br />4/3/06 - Ordinance includes changes made pursuant to the 1/9/06, 1/10/06 and 2/13/06 PC meetings and the 3/13/06 <br />City Council Work Session. <br />