1921-04-11-1925-08-24.tif - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Cotu~ell Oh~mbers, Eugene, Ore. Nay 29th, 19~-2' Council met pursuant to ad,jgUrnment of May. 15, 1922 and wa~ called to order by NaMer C 0 Petermon. Present Councilmen Wslker, Parks, ~cAlister, Willoughby,~ Nosher, Mon¥oe ea~d ~uimby. ,Lb'sent Kaldor. ~he' petition' of J'ohn and Annie ~[aughn asking cancellation "of ~a sewer assessment ~ho~vn in Dion Docket No,3 Pegs 278 of ~gene, Oregonwas denied The Judiela'x,y 'Committee ~%d CltyAttora~y ~'eported unfavorable uPo~ the petttio~ of C ~ Stevens Presen¥~ tothe Council N~ 15; 1922 toabate set aside and ~eel on record the ~iea rot construotl'on of a w~oden ~idewalk on She north side of Otb avenue west found in Dken Docket 3 pag:~ 18~ of the City Records of ~gene, Ore Ul~on motion the rei~,~rt w~ ~opt~. The question of stringing wires across the streets oi ~gene ~or aerial and wireless communication was.considered ~d the City Attorney was ~nstructed to prepare Ordinance tO govern ~d regulate the e~e. At this time pur~us.nt to ~vertisement bide for pavMg ef P~klin Boule- yard from the exis~lng pavement at. the lntersee~i,~n of Franklin Bouleva~ ~d l~ avenue east to connect with the exi~tl~g pavement_ now laid on 8th ave east In the city of ~g~e Oregon according to plus ~d specifications therefor were opentd ~d re~ Bids were reoeiv~ as follows: St ion Brothers ............ $28,775.50 Clark "aBlshop- Con Co ' $26,236.00 Said bids were referr~ to the street committee to consider and report at this me,ting. . The Street Co~ittee considered ~aid bids ~d reeo~end~ that the bid of Cla~'k & Bishop Construction Co for said improvement be acceptS. A remonstrate against the letting of any contract for the lmprovemmt of Franklin Boulevard by paving the sene fro~u 1~ avers east to 8th ave east as provid~ by Ordin~ees plus ~d ~eeifieations therefo¥ signed bM'J T H~NT ~D Others w~ fll~ with bhe City R~corder of ~gene, Oregon M~ 8 19~ Attorney E R Bryson appea~ before ~he Council at this time~ ~d filed a r~onstr~ee f~r ~d in beh~f of ~he Or,on California Rallro~ company signed by A J Gillette its ~en$ ~d She Souther~l Paolflo Comply by A J Gillette its agent~ Said r~ou~tranees ~d objections were considered bM the council ~d the council found ~galnst e~h r~onstrator and ~alnst e~h and all of their remonstrates ~d objections. Upo~ motion all r~onatranees ~d objections were denied ~d overrule. The Council consid.ered end deter:~imed the necessity o~ such improvement~ and on motion found end declared the ,~eme necesssry A m~tlon was ~.~de and end ~arried that the original ordinance No.297}