1921-04-11-1925-08-24.tif - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Councll Chemb~rs, ~ge~e, Oregon J ~nu ~ry ~nd ~ Court, ell me% ~ursu~ant to s~lJoumrme~t of December 11 1922 P_.~;esent C 0 P%ter~on, Na¥or;,Cou~ncilm%)l, P ~, I,~cAlister, $-R Rosher, De'~ H ~¥alker, Willoughby, 0 N Kaldor, G,~ W .%(oaroe aud E B Parks, Absmxt E E Quimby The B~ire aBd Water Committee by chairman Mosher asked for more time to report upon t.he 9etl~l?~n for a ;~treet light at the corner of 18th avenue and Agate str.ee~ '~he petition fo'r a street light at the ~,)r~er of [7th avenue and University street was denied. Aa Ordluanee levying assessment for the construction of a ~ewer In 17th Avenue, Patterso~i street, 18th avenue, 19th avenue ia the elty of h~gene _. _h~vln2 been_r~e~ ~he_flr~t_blme No~ember_lS,_1922'~nd iald-o~er for property owners that objections to said proposed assessment would be heard at~thi:~ time ObjectiOns were called for The only objections ~alnst said pro~o~e~ asse~sment were presented by attorne~ C the-property or Sarah E Patterson, John B Patter.~,~n and Percy J Patterson " elaimlAg that the assessments on s~td property l:~ t~o high. The ~att~r was referrel to the sewer ~o~ittee, city engineer and city attorney end further' cons'lderation of ~ai,i ordiaanc~ '~as po~tponed until next meeting · ~- The sewer eo~mmittee of the-city of ~gene'together with the City ~gi~l~r and city attorney presdnted the following report for eonsideratlo~ by the · Court ell TO THE CO~.~ON COUNCIL of the City of ~gene. -_ . We, the se~er co~ittee ef the city of ~ge~e tegtther with 5he clty ~glaeer and city attorney to whom was r~f~rred the matter Sarah'E Patterson, John B Patterson ~d Percy J Patterson to the th~ costs of the construction of a sewer In [Tth, 18th, and 19th avenues In the city of ~geae de~eribed In said proposed ordinance beg leave That the obJ~etion msxle by said objectors l:~ as to all of the propert, y_ assessed ia said proposed ordinance to the said sarah E Patterson, John B Patte~,'son and Percy J Patterson, as closer.[bed ia the s~nexed offer of eom promi:~e of settlement :~ubmitted by the said Patterso.[ls ......... _~e_ held seVeral-meetlng~- with 'the ~n-~t~eres-~! parties, inve~tiga~ed the sam~ g~4 beg leave to_~.eport as ~ollows: ......... -'. That in our .Judgement' and opinion the' ~ssesmnent egn not be l~.ssened e~ld that the property ls benefited to the ammm't ~F th~ proposed a~se~ment and that the objection thereto should be overrule~. ... ) We have al;~o, In connection with the ~said proposed a~sessment~ considered the offer o~ compromise e~ offer of payment made by the said Patte~son.~ which is hereto attached ~d affter a full and complet~ c~lva:s of the ;~ne believe that that th~ ~ald proposed settleme~t of pa~e~t should be rejected. TH'E~;DRE ~,~e recommend the pas~e of the pr,)p,)s~d ordinance levyi~g th~ assessment for the construction of said sewer c~d the rejection of the offer of e~mpromise Ga the ~ald s~we2 assessment ~d the o~alag of said streets. 0 N Kaldor E B Parks It was mo,/ed that the report bo adopted, Council votln~ aye 6 nay S R ~,lo~her, Th~ report was declared ~lopbed.