Laserfiche WebLink
Dr. Ba. rtle aq(i othe,~ appe.ared and spoke on the playground situation, referrin <br />to ~he letter of the Co u nty Court in agreeing .to s~t aside the East Park in the <br />City if the. City ~ould~ equip and supervise the same. Said matter was fully discuss- <br />ed and referred to Councilmen WIlllamson, Rugh and L~rge f~r further inve.~tl~a~ion. <br /> <br /> A pe~.ltlOn was reoelved fromowners of property lr~ Victoria Heights asking <br />· that the roadways' thersln be graded and put in condition .tp be paved at some <br /> future .time, and s~ald p~tl~loner~ 3ep~ratel~ ask~ that a 3ewer ~y~em be con- <br /> structed in said ~dltlon. Such matters were referr~ to the Street and Sewer <br /> Co~it~ees respectively. The 8~reet Co~lttee reco~end~ ~ha~ such pe~ltlon be <br /> granted, amd om mention duly earrl~ said ~epo'rt w~ un~lmo~ly ~opted. The <br /> Sewer CO~lttee asked for ~ditional time In whl~ ~Q.rep~rt. <br /> <br /> On request of~ the Police Cor~lttee L~o Soot~was Pla~ on the P~rell as <br /> a PatrOlman at $12~.00 per ~onth eo~enelng July 1, 1925.. ' <br /> <br /> On request Of the ~inanoe Committee Nellie Elllo~.t was placed on the pay <br /> re, ll commencing Ju%y l, 1925, at $80.00 per ~nth. <br /> <br /> Jo~l I~. quine~, thru the City ~gtneer, ask~ that' he be paid over-time ~hlle <br /> h~ was at~endlng ~e NatioNal Guard ~campment to the ~o~'t of $65.00. Said <br /> matte~ was dlae~s~, and such request was denied on account of said party not <br /> being on the payroll, and on ~o~t of those not being on the p~roll being <br /> p%rmitted to Oharse for overtime work, ~d for cap fa~e. <br /> <br /> Chairman Wlll~son: of the Sewer Committee spoke on the deplorable condition <br />_the ma~ %~ksewer is 'in at its mouth, and called attention to .the fact that <br /> th~ city would gelatin t~ouble wet% such condition not l~ediately abated. The <br /> ~lty ~glnae~ was [~stru~ to bring in his repor~ and <br /> repair and ~Prov~ea~ of ~he ou~le$ of said sewer <br /> <br /> The request df Trina Chase for p~.ment of $90.00 fen gravel us~ In reaching <br /> his dump greed across the ~lver w~ made to the Council.' No aetlon was taken. <br /> <br /> A letter was ?end from chief Nusbaum of the Fire Department calling attention <br /> to the dangerous"cbnditIOm ~of the City as a fire hazard, <br /> grow em vacant lotM ef the City. N~ aetlon' w~ ~en other th~ 'infomlng Mr. <br /> Nusba~ that an Or~linanoe would bepresented at thismeetlng of the Couhbll to <br /> penny thls, condition. <br /> <br /> Om motion, unanimously adopt~ a hotel llcense we~s Issued to the New ~Agene, <br /> Hotel. <br /> <br /> A petitlon w~ recetv~ from G~ ~ Pyle ~kl~ that a r~ estimate of the <br /> rec~ andothe~ excavation work on 2Jnd and 2~rd Aves. from MeMlllan to Charaelton, <br /> and on MoMllla~ from ~2nd t~ 24th be m~e. on motion duly ~econded,- said matter <br /> was lald om the table. ' <br /> <br /> ,Aerial Permit~ were granted to the following: Lawrence Whytal, at 386 9th <br />Ave. W. Harry Able, 2~4 7th Ave. W. and C.A. Crandall at 1588 Patterson Stret. <br /> <br /> A~_torney Joh~M. Williams Presented to the-Counoll a 'deed of dedication to <br /> the property, In 2alrmoun% Addlblon embraced In what 14 known ~s Hambles Plat. <br /> Said deed was duly filed. <br /> <br /> - .A petition wa~ received f~om-tHe Foley ~d BUrke Shows ~kl~ that their license <br />fee~ of $~0.00 as~paid By r~uced to $130.00 In accordance with thelnformal <br />-agreement m~e by ,the M~or ~d cert'~ members of the CeunCll on M~ 8, 192~. <br /> Said ~tter w~ discussed ~d a metlon w~ m~e that, such re~Usst be denied. The <br /> rol~ was call~, a~l ~resent voting ~e, except Monroe who ~eted ne, ~d Si~,ons <br /> who w~ absent. F ~ ~ 1~ <br /> <br /> The followlng~ resolution was offerS, ~d em motion, un~lmously ~opt~: <br /> . ~ <br /> ~. ~ R ES 0 LU T.I 0 N. <br /> <br /> Whereas, I~+~ ~1, of Block 2~, of ~alrmoUnt, owned by Susan ~. Prior, w~s assess- <br />ed for a sldewalk~.~_adJacent to said ~rope~ty 1D the ~ount ef $~8.6~, under <br />Ordinance No. ~4219~ pass~, and approv~ on the 23rd d~ ~f Jung, 1924, ~d was <br />again assessed in~vertently for a like ~ount under Ordln~ce No. 4392, passed <br />and._ approval, on Se~tembe~~ . 8, 1.924, . ...:~ <br /> <br /> ~D WHE~E~, ~y reason of said second assess~e~t said lot ~ar~leS a ~oUble <br />assessment for ~he~s~e lmpr~v~emt. <br /> <br /> <br />