Admin Order 58-04-15 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

was expressed not to have a small dog park area since that would result m a crowded, muddy, and messy area. The dog off leash area at Amazon Park was used as an example of an area that was too small at approximately 2.5 acres. Even at the s~ze of the more recently developed dog off leash area in Alton Baker Park, 4 acres, degradation has occurred to the turf. It was d~scussed that lrr~proved drmnage and ~rngat~on may be necessary to help the turf w~thstand the constant year round use that dog off leash areas receive. A statement was made that people come w~th their dogs from south and east Eugene to use the Candlelight off leash area. Several people lobbied for at least half (5.5 acres) of the Candlelight park to be designated as an off leash dog park on the master plan, wNle others said that no more than half of the park should be reserved for the dog off leash use. Everyone present felt that whatever the size, the dog off leash area should be made accessible. A suggestion was made to consider using the southwest comer of the park s~te as the dog off leash area. It has a natural separation from the rest of the park s~te by the ex~snng open drainage way. Access fi'om the north and east would need to be provided by a footbridge over the drainage way. Providing shade in dog off leash area was considered important. Shade trees and a covered gazebo or shelter was proposed. Other amenmes such as dnnk~ng fountmns, benches, etc were mentioned as desirable. The ~dea of developing sports fields at Candlehght did not receive much support from the people in attendance. Even though people were told that the City had long beheved that this park due to ~ts s~ze and fiat topography would be an ~deal s~te to locate sports fields, there was not much sympathy among the group to see this happen. People were more opposed to seeing a ball field than a soccer field~ In fact, after some d~scuss~on, the group stated that they would not mind seeing soccer fields since such a space had multiple use value. When not used for game play, ~t would provide open space for other mfomml act~wt~es. Ball fields were considered a more formal use that reqmred more infrastructure, and d~d not lend themselves readily to alternate uses. Whde on the s~te posting for the first pubhc meeting, a neighbor approached staff' and briefly provided some wewpomts. WNle being happy to see the s~te finally developed for a variety of uses, he felt that prowdmg faclht~es for active play such as basketball and soccer were especmlly important. One person expressed an interest m seeing w~ldhfe haNtat developed ~n the park. Since the s~te has been mmntamed over ~ts history as a rough mown field, there is little existing haNtat value. Any s~gmficant haNtat would need to be created. A logical location for this would be along the open waterway comdor that runs through the park. PARK LANDSCAPE The 'wetland' status of the park s~te was discussed. A wetland dehneauon was performed wNch documented approximately V~ acre of low quality wetland. Most of the wetland ~s located on the easts~de of the park, approximately halfway between ~ts north and south boundaries. A very small amount of wetland ~s documented along the bottom of the small open dramageway that traverses tNough the park s~te. The C~ty ~s planmng on purchasing mmgat~on credits m the West Eugene Wetland M~t~gatlon Bank m order to develop the park. The cost to purchase these credits is estimated to be approximately $25,000. The open dramage way through the park ~s one of the upper reaches of the GreenNll -IMbutary, which ~s undergoing coordinated enhancement ~mprovements. As part of that overall program, the City ~s planning on creating an enhanced waterway through Candlehght Park. Design opnons will be explored wNch will lay back the steep banks of the waterway, open up or widen portions, meander ~ts ahgnment to fit around other uses ~n the park, and plant native vegetation that w~ll hopefully create haNtat and stormwater filtration value. The open waterway w~ll likely reqmre at least a couple of pedestrmn crossings, w~th footbridges being preferred over culvert crossings. Candlehght Park ~s a fiat s~te w~th l~ttle or no topograpNc rehef. A short d~scuss~on addressed the ~dea of modifying the s~te grades. People d~d not want to see extensive mounding that could result in ~Nd~ng' places for undesirable act~wtles. Admittedly though, the audience d~d see benefit m some low height