Admin Order 58-04-15 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

EVEN THOLITH NO"i SHOWN ON THE SCIIEM,\TIC ['LAN, S]TAF[ ~;kAN FEI) THE AbD1ENCE IO KNOW TI4A"I LIGHJtNG V&'OULD BE INCLUDED AS PAR l OF TI-lB PAPK2~ DEVELOPMENT. * A COMMFNF W4.5 MADE THA'I FENCING IS KIND OF A NEGAJIYE FEA1 URE. DIE ,gU(iGES ~ WAS MADE FO ItAYE FENCING ALONG ROYAL ONLY. AND MAYBE I.;SE A L OW WOOD F E NCE OR A WIRE FFNCE. (Staff agrees that ibncing can sometimes be unsightly, however ~n many s~tuations where contmnment ~s impo~ant, it ~s necessary.) A PARTICIPANT COMMENTED f'IIA-F 'iHF DRAFT PLAN LOOKS ~0t)TIMFS BETTER THAN WItA [ SHE AN t ICIPATED. In Snmmar~ In general the &a~ plan was well recmved. Some individuals s~ongly endorsed the plan as shown at the meeting. The s~ongest dissention was from dog park proponents who felt the allotted space for the dog park was too small. Staff ageed to look at the open wate~ay chapel aliment to see if some adjustment would provide a little more room for the dog p~k, however maintaimng a balance of uses on this nmghborhood park would hkely hm~t this to a relatively small ~ncrease. Strong support was g~ven for the active use plaza area and for the concept of ~nco~orating exercise stations near the pathways for the elderly and people ~n wheelchairs. All pamcipants were excited over the prospect of semng th~s park cons~ucted in 2005 and urged the City to use what ever funding available to complete as much of the plan katures as possible. Closin~ Staff outlined the remaining process required to adopt the park plan and confirmed the construction timeline is still being planned for the summer of 2005. Once a final park design is reached, the City will need to apply for the joint D~vision of State Lands/Army Corps permit to mitigate the small wetland. This permit process can take up to 6 months and staff would like to have it completed prior to starting the construction drawings late this year. Furthermore, a site review or conditional use permit process may be reqmred for some of the plan elements, pamcularly the restroom. In the interest of moving the planning process along, staff asked the group if they felt a 3rd meeting was necessary if the plan changes were mailed to them w~th a comment period? The consensus of the group was to not have another meeting as long as they received copies of the revised plan and were g~ven the opportunity to comment.