My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 5: Ratification of IGR Actions
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2011
>
CC Agenda - 04/11/11 Meeting
>
Item 5: Ratification of IGR Actions
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/8/2011 10:26:50 AM
Creation date
4/7/2011 4:17:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
4/11/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
77
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Contact Respondent Dept Updated Priority Recommendation <br />Chuck Tilby EPD-ADM 3/5/2011 Pri 1 Oppose <br /> <br />Comments: See comments for HB 2951, appears identical: Amending first sections to include "serious <br />physical injury" to the definitions is just fine. The next change increases the number of sessions <br />with a mental health professional that the City will pay for from 2 to 6. Not only would this be a <br />3x increase in these sessions, but adding "involved officer" could increase these another 2 or <br />more times - monetary impact 9 times the cost to the City. Mandates involved officers attend <br />ALL of the sessions (currently it says "at least one"). Not all involved officers need this amount <br />of work. In most cases, a single session as described works well in that it describes the symptoms <br />of traumatic incidents so that the officers are able to recognize normal reactions that otherwise <br />may be disturbing. To mandate 6 sessions for all involved is way too much - doesn't serve <br />officers well, but serves mental health professionals quite well. The requirement for a 72 hour re- <br />assignment is essentially our existing policy. OK to mandate it because many agencies in the <br />state do not do this. The next session mandates testing for controlled substances and anabolic <br />steroids. Currently, this is an option that is offered to employees, but lacking reasonable grounds <br />to believe an officer is taking such substances, the City cannot mandate the test. Expect a large <br />negative reaction to this paragraph from unions. Typically, the City sees advantage for taking the <br />tests, but current labor rules support the option. Mandating the tests is not advisable and <br />increases the City's costs for paying for such tests. The next section (6) is a major problem with <br />this bill. It takes the investigation out of the hands of a multi-agency investigation team (SB111 - <br />In Lane County it is the Interagency Deadly Force Investigation Team) which has been <br />successfully operating for several years. This bill mandates the Department of Justice conducts <br />the investigation and then is reimbursed by the DA's office. First, DOJ does not have the <br />resources to conduct the investigations we request of them, now, but to add responsibility to <br />investigate all officer-involved shootings would result in inordinate delay in investigations, which <br />is a major stressor for involved officers (often times more than the incident itself). Additionally, <br />DOJ does not have investigatory expertise when it comes to investigating such incidents - a major <br />advantage of the current system where experienced investigators from different agencies, <br />coordinated by OSP, conduct the investigation. DOJ also does not have forensic capabilities. All <br />of these issues will significantly reduce the quality and timeliness of these critical investigations. <br />Removes local control provided by SB111 and turns it over to the state in the form of DOJ. <br />Section 8 of this bill (appropriately numbered) mandates that DPSST establish a periodic <br />psychological exam as a condition of employment as a police officer. This is a major departure <br />from existing industry standards. Psychological testing is not an exact science, and often reach <br />conclusions only if they are supported by observable behaviors, relying on a background during a <br />hiring process. Standards do not exist for retention decisions., Mandating such a periodic test <br />would undoubtedly result in litigation of cases where an officer was deemed not to have passed. <br />Current law allows for agencies to address psychological issues and mandating tests would be <br />costly and fraught with legal problems. <br /> <br /> <br />SB 0899 <br /> <br />Relating Clause: Relating to sex trafficking. <br /> <br />Title: Creates Assistance to Victims of Sex Trafficking Program. <br /> <br />Sponsored by: By Senator STARR; Senators ATKINSON, DEVLIN, Representatives BARKER, DOHERTY, <br />ESQUIVEL, HUFFMAN, KENNEMEW, KRIEGER, LINDSAY, TOMEI <br />19 | Page <br />March 16, 2011 IGR Committee Meeting <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.