Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF JOINT PUBLIC HEARING WITH EUGENE CITY COUNCIL, Page 5 <br />METROPOLITAN POLICY COMMITTEE, AND LANE TRANSIT DISTRICT <br />BOARD OF DIRECTORS, FEBRUARY 8, 2011 <br />unanswered questions. He questioned how operating costs could be less than traditional service <br />since the buses were costlier to purchase and they were more expensive to operate. He had <br />observed the Gateway route which carries only 10 passengers during non -peak hours. He <br />questioned projections for ridership. Routes, especially the Breeze service, have been cut. He is <br />concerned about ridership of the current system through the West 11 Avenue corridor, which was <br />minimal during non -peak hours. He questioned LTD's transparency, noting questions on its <br />Facebook page went largely unanswered. This is a dividing issue in the community, and he <br />encouraged a "no" vote. He said we should take more time to work out the details and achieve <br />success in the community. <br />Elaine Zablocki, Ferry Street, Eugene, is a private citizen who is getting older. She will drive less in <br />the future, and expects the cost of gas to go up. She will not buy an electric car. She asked the <br />business people on West 11 Avenue to please think about what would happen if one -third of their <br />customers were no longer driving. She bought plants from Grays and brought them home on the <br />bus. She suggested that in the future, buses should accommodate people who get on buses with <br />shopping carts. She wants to see more stores have delivery services, which presents a private <br />enterprise opportunity for businesses. She said the blue van provides transportation to the airport <br />and wants to see that same service to Valley River Center and Fred Meyer. <br />Rusty Rexius, Panorama Road, Springfield, stated his support for EmX. He supports the many <br />challenges in providing this important service. People are concerned with property rights, business <br />interruptions, and operational costs. LTD has worked diligently to address those concerns. In the <br />long term, the community will be faced with a growing population with confined space to house and <br />employ people. Those challenges can be met. The greatest challenge will be to figure out how to <br />move a growing population reliably, effectively, and efficiently. It is important to invest in a public <br />transportation system, which helps meet housing and employment needs. It is important to develop <br />a transportation corridor, and rapid transit is an important element of the corridor. A dense and <br />livable downtown has long been a goal of the City. EmX will help make that become a reality. There <br />are many people who will continue to live on the edges of the city and will need to drive. A rising <br />student population and successful business recruitment needed a viable transportation system. <br />Jack Meacham, West 28 Eugene, rides and supports EmX. It is important to think in terms of <br />quality of life for the future. Eugene's population will increase in the next decade, and traffic <br />congestion will be bad in 2020. Cars are getting more expensive for families to purchase and <br />maintain. The cost of gas will go up, resulting in gas shortages. In a decade, substantially more <br />Eugene residents will have to rely on public rapid transportation, and using the bus will become a <br />necessity for many people. Decades ago many people thought covered wagons were sufficient to <br />move people and goods, and railroads were a waste of tax money. More recently, many people <br />thought slow, two -lane highways were sufficient; and many of those cities were by- passed by the <br />interstate highway system. The automobile age is coming to a close. Without quality public <br />transportation, Eugene will no longer be competitive with other cities. It is important to extend the <br />competitive quality of life to attract business and jobs to the community. <br />Larry Reed, Scenic Drive, Eugene, stated his support for EmX. He had written a letter to the City <br />Council and the Envision Eugene group. He asked the City Council to read the letter again. LTD was <br />not building rapid transit to serve single - family, detached housing neighborhoods. EmX was not <br />designed to maintain the status quo, but for 20 -30 years in the future. He asked what was the <br />alternative, and if the West Eugene Parkway or another parkway project would be revisited. He <br />asked if a much larger expansion of the urban growth boundary (LIGB) and continuation of single - <br />family, low- density residential development in farm land and other resource land would be lobbied <br />for. He did not think the community would come up with a different solution. EmX is not requiring <br />business to change how they do business today, but the businesses should be thinking about the <br />future. He encouraged the officials to support BRT. <br />