Laserfiche WebLink
Senate Bill 0542 <br />Councilor Brown, seconded by Councilor Poling, moved to adopt the CCIGR <br />recommendation of Priority 3 Oppose for Senate Bill 0542. <br />Responding to a question from Councilor Ortiz, Ms. Wilson explained that the League of Oregon Cities <br />was attempting to remove the restrictions in the use of transient room tax funds to allow more flexibility <br />in their use as long as the use was still related to tourism. The bill would allow the tax revenues to be <br />used by local governments to maintain roads that serve tourist destinations. <br />Councilor Poling explained that he proposed to change the staff recommendation for Priority 2 Support <br />because the definition of tourism - related facilities was vague. He believed that under the definition, <br />Interstate 5 could be considered such a facility. The loss of the transient room tax funding would be <br />detrimental to the promotion of tourism. It was unclear how the bill would affect the funding for <br />organizations such as Travel Lane County. <br />Councilor Clark agreed with Councilor Poling's position, although he was generally supportive of <br />increasing local control. He was concerned about the potential loss of funds used for marketing tourism <br />and he did not think that such funding should be eliminated in difficult economic times. He suggested <br />that one unanticipated outcome of the passage of the bill could be that the City lost State Road Fund <br />moneys. <br />Councilor Zelenka also found the definitions vague and questioned how one defined a road that served a <br />tourist destination. <br />Ms. Wilson agreed with Mr. Poling that the definitions in the bill were very broad. <br />Councilor Taylor moved to amend the motion to change the City's position on the bill to <br />Priority 2 Support. The motion died for lack of a second. <br />Roll call vote; the motion passed, 6:2; councilors Taylor and Farr voting no. <br />House Bill 2231 <br />Councilor Brown, seconded by Councilor Poling, moved to adopt the CCIGR <br />recommendation of Monitor for House Bill 2331. <br />Councilor Zelenka, seconded by Councilor Taylor, moved to amend the motion to change <br />the City's position on House Bill 2231 to Priority 1 Support. <br />Councilor Clark said that in general, those who smoked were low - income. The City worked to change <br />the school income tax referral to avoid affecting the low- income, and the bill in question would increase <br />taxes on the same group. He did not support the motion. <br />Responding to a question from Councilor Brown about the anticipated increase, Mr. Walsh said it would <br />increase five cents. Councilor Brown asked what the tax was used for. Mr. Walsh reviewed the <br />allocation split for the revenue realized by the tax. He also noted that the bill required three -fifths <br />approval by both legislative houses. <br />MINUTES— Eugene City Council February 28, 2011 Page 9 <br />Regular Meeting <br />