Laserfiche WebLink
Transit, to make an informed decision. He said there were many people opposed to the route and he felt <br />that the concerns of those people were minimized over the project review period. His organization, which <br />was a grassroots organization, was gaining momentum and support in regard to the issue. He said that <br />supporters of EmX had insinuated that his organization received outside funding but such organizations <br />developed when people strongly believed in an issue. <br />Mr. Machierione did not think that the proposed EmX route was viable because LTD's own numbers <br />indicated that the operating costs were too expensive. LTD did not have the money to operate the route. <br />The agency had been using federal money for operating expenses for some time. LTD could not continue <br />to spend at a deficit rate. He pointed out that LTD had faced a $3 million funding gap and had reduced <br />basic bus service by 20 percent. He did not think it made sense for LTD to spend $1 million annually to <br />operate in a 4 -1/2 mile corridor given that the corridor had bus service already. <br />Mayor Piercy closed the Public Forum and thanked people for their remarks. She observed that she had <br />once owned a goat, and recalled how inquisitive it was. She solicited council questions and comments. <br />Councilor Farr thanked those who testified for their information about goats. <br />Councilor Ortiz was willing to consider changes to the code to accommodate urban goat keeping. <br />Councilor Brown thanked all for testifying. He believed that the council could come up with a solution <br />that allowed people to keep 2 or 3 goats. He thanked those who spoke on behalf of Civic Stadium, saying <br />it would be tragic if the facility was torn down. He believed the City had a role to play in the property's <br />disposition through its moral authority and suggested it could broker a compromise that saved the facility. <br />Councilor Zelenka supported a council work session on goats. <br />Responding to a question from Councilor Farr, City Attorney Glenn Klein indicated that the council could <br />provide input about its ongoing support of the West Eugene EmX project to LTD as long as that occurred <br />before LTD took final action on the project. Because the action the council took on March 9 was not <br />formalized through a legal action, the council had the ability to amend its action at a future meeting. <br />2. CONSENT CALENDAR <br />A. Approval of City Council Minutes <br />- January 24, 2011, Regular Meeting <br />- February 14, 2011, Regular Meeting <br />- March 1, 2011, Boards and Commissions Interviews <br />B. Approval of Tentative Working Agenda <br />C. Ratification of Intergovernmental Relations Committee Minutes of February 23, <br />2011 <br />D. Approval of Neighborhood Matching Grants for Fiscal Year 2011 <br />E. Adoption of Resolution 5026 Authorizing the Issuance and Sale of Electric Utility <br />System Revenue Bonds for the Purpose of Financing Improvements to the Electric <br />Utility System in the Aggregate Principal Amount Not to Exceed Thirty -six Million <br />Dollars ($36,000,000) <br />Authorizing the Issuance and Sale of Electric Utility Revenue Refunding Bonds in <br />the Aggregate Principal Amount of Not to Exceed Forty -Six Million Eight Hundred <br />Thousand Dollars ($46,800,000) to Refund Series 1998A Taxable Bonds and Series <br />2001B Bonds; and Providing for Related Matters <br />MINUTES— Eugene City Council March 14, 2011 Page 4 <br />Regular Meeting <br />