My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Ordinance No. 18686
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Ordinances
>
1980s No. 18550-19659
>
Ordinance No. 18686
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/3/2012 11:01:24 AM
Creation date
4/22/2011 12:54:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Recorder
CMO_Document_Type
Ordinances
Document_Date
7/28/1980
Document_Number
18686
CMO_Effective_Date
7/28/1980
Author
Sandra Stubbs
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
114
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
!8686 <br />B . 'Growth Management and the Urban Service Area <br />To effectively control the potential for urban sprawl and scattered urbanization,, <br />compact growth and the urban service area concept are, and will remain, the <br />primary growth management techniques for directing geographic patterns of <br />urbanization in the community. In general, this means the filling in of vacant <br />and underutilized 1 ands , as well as redevelopment inside the urban growth <br />boundary. <br />Outward. expansion of the projected urban service area, as defined in the <br />glossary, will occur only when it is proven necessary according to the recom- <br />mended policies set forth in this Plan, particularly in this element. <br />Find innc, <br />1. Many metropolitan areas within the United States that have not <br />implemented geographic - growth management techniques suffer from <br />scattered or 1 -frog urban growth that leaves vacant and under- <br />utilized land in its path and encourages isolated residential develop- <br />ments far from metropolitan centers. Until adoption of the 1990 <br />Plan's urban service area concept, portions of this metropolitan area <br />were characterized by these phenomena. <br />2. Beneficial results of compact urban growth include: <br />a. Use of most vacant left-over parcels where uti 1 iti es assessed to <br />abutting property owners are already in place. <br />b. Protection of productive forest lands, agricultural lands, <br />and open space from premature urban development. <br />c. More efficient use of limited fuel energy resources and greater <br />use of bicycle and pedestrian facilities due to less miles of <br />streets and less auto dependence than otherwi would be required, <br />d. Decreased acreage of leap-frogged vacant land, thus resulting ' <br />in more efficient and less costly provision and use of ut i l - <br />i ties, roads, and public services such as fire protection, <br />e. Greater urban transit efficiency by providing ahigher <br />level of service for a given investment in transit equipment and <br />the like. <br />3. The disadvantages of a too compact urban growth boundary can be <br />a disproportionately greater increase in the value of vacant land <br />within the Eugene - Springfield area which would contribute to higher <br />housing prices. <br />4�6 Periodic evaluation of land use needs compared to land supply provides <br />a basis for orderly and non - excessive conversion of rural land to <br />urbanizable land, <br />II -B -1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.