Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> <br />The pro forma assumes that SCS will lease the site from 4J for the first two years for $70,000 per <br />year. After two years, the pro forma assumes the net cost of the lease will be $30,000 ($70,000 <br />payment to 4J, less $40,000 rent from another entity subleasing the northern portion of the site). <br />Those expenses, plus the other expenses and revenues, SCS believes, will produce net operating <br />income of $527,000 (first year of full operation). The pro forma does not include any funds to <br />pay the $22 million that SCS estimates it will cost to construct the improvements at Civic <br />Stadium, or for debt service on that amount. The proposal assumes that the development costs <br />will be paid for by donations, grants, possibly loans, or maybe a City-issued GO bond. For a <br />point of reference, a $10 million bond or loan at five percent interest, repaid over 20 years, <br />would cost approximately $800,000 per year. <br /> <br /> <br />The estimated $22 million development cost excludes any funds to address parking or traffic <br />issues. <br /> <br /> <br />The pro forma estimates that the expenses during the first two years – before there are any <br />revenues from a soccer team or other use of the site – total approximately $1.2 million. The pro <br />forma assumes that those costs will be paid for by donations and possibly grant funds. <br /> <br /> <br />The pro forma assumes that $325,000 will be raised each year through the sale of approximately <br />215 Club Memberships at $1,500 each. <br /> <br /> <br />The pro forma makes assumptions about the number of concerts and other non-soccer related <br />events that would bring in revenue. Absent a feasibility and marketing study, staff cannot <br />evaluate whether those assumptions are reasonable. Absent such a study, it also is difficult to <br />evaluate the extent to which SCS’ proposal would compete with City-owned venues, such as <br />Cuthbert or the Hult Center, and what effect that might have on the City’s budget. <br /> <br />During this work session, the council should answer the following questions: <br /> <br /> <br />Should the City join with SCS and commit financial resources to make the SCS proposal more <br />competitive? <br /> <br />If so: <br /> <br />What is the dollar limit on what the council will commit? <br />o <br /> <br />Where will those funds come from? During the last Budget Committee meeting, the City <br />o <br />Manager and finance staff explained about the current and on-going projected gap in the <br />general fund. Any funds for Civic will need to come from an as-yet-unidentified, new <br />revenue source, or the council will need to identify services that are currently provided <br />that would be reduced or eliminated. <br /> <br /> <br />RELATED CITY POLICIES <br /> <br />Growth Management Policies <br /> <br />Effective Accountable Municipal Government: A government that works openly, <br />collaboratively and fairly with the community to achieve measurable and positive outcomes and <br />provide effective, efficient services <br /> <br /> <br />COUNCIL OPTIONS <br /> <br />The April 13 PowerPoint on Civic Stadium suggested a possible revised 4J proposal as follows: <br /> <br />City joins with Save Civic Stadium <br /> <br />Two-year lease with automatic long-term extension if development milestones are met <br /> \\Cesrv500\cc support\CMO\2011 Council Agendas\M110509\S110509A.doc <br /> <br />