Laserfiche WebLink
<br />thth <br />Ms. Ortiz agreed with Mr. Zelenka about the merits of the 11/13 option. While she had initially <br />ththth <br />supported the 6/7/11 option because of her interest in seeing the route go down Highway 99, she was <br />not attached to either option. <br /> <br />ththth <br />Mr. Pryor said he liked the 6/7/11 option because of the residential ridership potential that existed in <br />the Whiteaker neighborhood and the route’s potential for commercial ridership. He acknowledged that <br />ththththth <br />the 11/13 option could be cheaper and faster but the 6/7/11 option might better help the City <br />achieve its goals. He said that forwarding two options kept uncertainty alive, but he believed it would <br />facilitate the type of conversation he would like to have. <br /> <br />Mr. Farr indicated he opposed the substitute motion because it increased the cost of serving Bethel in the <br />future. He also believed it was better to narrow the options in order to narrow the issues of contention. <br /> <br />Mr. Brown did not support the substitute motion. He was ready to make a decision. <br /> <br />Ms. Taylor did not support the substitute motion. She did not think there was any point in LTD doing <br />more analysis. <br /> <br />With the consent of her second, Mr. Zelenka, Ms. Ortiz withdrew her motion. <br /> <br />ththth <br />Mr. Poling said he supported the 6/7/11 option and would support the motion. <br /> <br />The motion passed unanimously, 8:0. <br /> <br />Mayor Piercy adjourned the work session at 1:18 p.m. <br /> <br />Respectfully submitted, <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Beth Forrest <br />City Recorder <br /> <br />(Recorded by Kimberly Young) <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council March 9, 2011 Page 7 <br /> Work Session <br />