Laserfiche WebLink
Councilor Clark supported the committee recommendation but he acknowledged why staff supported the <br />legislation in question. It was reasonable to seek mechanisms that allowed the City to realize more <br />money without raising property tax rates. It seemed like an easy fix, but Councilor Clark considered it a <br />back -door tax increase. The bill changed the rules in the middle of the game and affected the timing of <br />how people paid their taxes. The proposed change took away the discount for people who paid their <br />property taxes early and eliminated their ability to save a little money in return for paying in a timely way <br />upfront. <br />Councilor Zelenka asked the purpose of the discount. Ms. Wilson responded that the original policy <br />purpose of the discount was to provide government entities, particularly smaller cities, with cash flow, by <br />giving residents an incentive to pay their taxes early. She did not think the original legislation was <br />intended to provide a benefit for citizens. <br />Councilor Zelenka supported the proposed legislation because of the funding shortfall faced by State and <br />local government. <br />Councilor Clark pointed out that local government would have gotten more money if the discount was not <br />in force but local taxpayers would have had to pay that much more. <br />Councilor Pryor believed there were arguments in support of both sides. He said that the discount for <br />early cash payment of property taxes had been in force for a long time and Oregon residents were used to <br />it. However, given the relatively small amounts involved for most people and the shortfalls faced by <br />State and local government, he was willing to support the bill. <br />Councilor Farr determined from Ms. Wilson that there was no corresponding senate bill. The bill had <br />been put forward by the House Interim Revenue Committee chaired by Representative Phil Barnhart and <br />had enjoyed a hearing. Ms. Wilson believed that the co- chairs of the committee both favored the concept. <br />Because the bill was a Revenue Committee bill, it was not subject to the same deadlines as other bills. <br />City Manager Ruiz indicated that the legislation was a significant funding issue for the City. He pointed <br />out that the bill merely asked people to pay their taxes. He expressed cautious optimistic about the City's <br />budget but said there was still some financial uncertainty that lay ahead. He recommended the council <br />support the original staff position of Priority 1, Support. <br />Councilor Taylor believed if the law was changed no one would pay their property taxes early. She <br />determined that Ms. Wilson that there was still benefit to early payment, and the bill was drafted to <br />change the payment dates for property taxes to make half the tax bill due on November 15 and the other <br />half due on May 15. Governments would be receiving half of the taxes owed rather than a third. <br />Speaking to the remarks of Councilor Pryor, Councilor Taylor observed that even small amounts were <br />challenging for some residents to afford. <br />Councilor Farr agreed a few dollars could mean a lot to some residents. However, he favored the <br />legislation because of the original intent behind the discount. <br />Councilor Taylor, seconded by Councilor Poling, moved to support the CCIGR position <br />of Priority 3, Oppose on House Bill 3167. The motion failed, 5:3; councilors Taylor, <br />Poling, and Clark voting yes. <br />MINUTES— Eugene City Council April 11, 2011 Page 8 <br />Regular Meeting <br />