Laserfiche WebLink
increases in the number of users of the system infrastructure. Those few increases of <br />users probably would not offset the decreases in the system usage from other properties <br />that are vacant and that are underutilized. The increase in SDCs isn't warranted or <br />advisable in this economic climate. <br />Response: Per the most recent (2009) Annual Population Report published by <br />Portland State University's Population Research Center, the average population growth <br />rate in Oregon between 2000 and 2009 is 1.2 %. Eugene's growth rate over that time <br />period is 13.9 %. while the Report acknowledges that Oregon's growth rates have tended <br />to be lower during a recessive economy, migratory inflows have continued to be positive <br />over the previous decade in spite of high Oregon unemployment rates. Oregon's (and <br />Eugene's) public infrastructure is certainly being used by an increasing population. <br />SDCs are an important funding component of planned public infrastructure <br />projects that fully, or in part, will provide capacity for new growth anticipated in this <br />community over a' multi -year planning period to "build -out" of the current Eugene Urban <br />Growth Boundary. Staff and contracted expert consultants strive, to every extent possible, <br />to develop system methodologies with cost bases founded upon technical merit that <br />includes consideration of population growth and future infrastructure needs over a <br />planning horizon much longer than one of, say, five years. This develops a rate based <br />upon a growth trend over a long period of time as opposed to one that reflects spikes up <br />and down over shorter time periods and which reflect more acutely the effects of global <br />recession upon the local economy. while there have been instances recently of final <br />construction costs coming in lower than initial project estimates, this again simply <br />reflects a relatively small cause /effect within a much larger window of consideration. <br />The effective date of this administrative order has been delayed to June 1, 2011. <br />This June 1, 2011, effective date will correspond with the effective date of the reduction <br />to parks SDC rates that City staff will be proposing to the City Council. If Council <br />adopts the proposed park SDC rates reduction, that rate adjustment together with this <br />administrative order's 3.5% rate increase will result in an overall reduction in the amount <br />of SDCs currently collected for the average single - family home._ Specifically, if the <br />Council approves City staff s recommendation to reduce the parks SDC with the June 1, <br />2011 effective date, the total SDCs collected for an average single - family home will be <br />approximately -0.98% or - $88.15 less than is currently collected in SDCs. <br />No changes are being made to the SDC rates as a result of this comment. <br />Comment 7 : Mark Lawrence is opposed to the proposed increases and feels that <br />now is not the right time for such increases because it will only help further suppress the <br />home building and construction industry by making housing even less affordable than it <br />already is in the City of Eugene. He states that the developers, builders and contractors <br />can no longer afford to absorb these costs without passing them along to their clients. <br />Such an increase at this time is only counterproductive and will only help in drying up <br />what little construction activity there is in Eugene. <br />Administrative order - Page 6 of 8 <br />