My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item B: Ward Redistricting - Criteria
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2011
>
CC Agenda - 06/27/11 Work Session
>
Item B: Ward Redistricting - Criteria
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/24/2011 1:50:54 PM
Creation date
6/24/2011 9:58:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
6/27/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Attachment B – Public Feedback <br /> <br />Public Comment: <br />Received: May 18, 2011 <br />From: League of Women Voters <br /> <br />In response to the survey questions presented to the board by City Staff, the League of Women Voters indicated <br />support for the following criteria: <br /> <br /> <br />Each ward should have about the same number of people within a range of +/- 3 percent. <br /> <br /> <br />The size of the wards should not be changed to account for expected changes in the number of people <br /> <br />living in them. This could create inequities now without guaranteeing equity will be attained in the <br />future. <br /> <br />Ward boundaries should change as little as possible. <br /> <br /> <br />The council should redraw ward boundaries without considering where current elected officials live. <br /> <br /> <br />Ward boundaries should be drawn to keep groups with potentially similar interests together <br /> <br /> <br />Wards should be as compact as possible. <br /> <br /> <br />Geography and natural features like the river, railroad tracks, and major roads or bridges should be used <br /> <br />to guide ward boundaries. <br /> <br />Geography and natural features may make more sense as dividing lines between wards. <br /> <br /> <br />Their highest priorities among these criteria included: <br /> <br /> <br />Each ward should have about the same number of people within a range of +/- 3 percent. <br /> <br /> <br />The size of the wards should not be changed to account for expected changes in the number of people <br /> <br />living in them. This could create inequities now without guaranteeing equity will be attained in the <br />future. <br /> <br />The council should redraw ward boundaries without considering where current elected officials live. <br /> <br /> <br />Wards should be as compact as possible. <br /> <br /> <br />Lower priority was given to: <br /> <br /> <br />Ward boundaries should change as little as possible. <br /> <br /> <br />Ward boundaries should be drawn to keep groups with potentially similar interests together Geography <br /> <br />and natural features like the river, railroad tracks, and major roads or bridges should be used to guide <br />ward boundaries. <br />8 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.