My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 3A: Approval of City Council Minutes
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2011
>
CC Agenda - 07/11/11 Meeting
>
Item 3A: Approval of City Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/8/2011 10:58:00 AM
Creation date
7/7/2011 1:44:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
7/11/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
decision, not a technical decision, but was committed to providing the council with data to inform its <br />decision. <br /> <br />TRG members Mr. Boles and Mr. Duncan then presented a housing mix comparison focused on what the <br />TRG considered the extremes of the range: 60:40 single-family/multi-family and 40:60 single- <br />family/multi-family. Mr. Boles asked the council to consider which end of the range was more <br />compatible with the Seven Pillars and reminded the council that because of the phased implementation <br />approach, it would have an opportunity to revisit its decision. <br /> <br />Ms. Gardner then briefly discussed the proposed phased implementation approach, saying it was meant to <br />address the uncertainty of the future and provide the City with flexibility and adaptability. She <br />anticipated staff would share more information about the proposed approach at a future meeting. <br /> <br />Mr. Clark endorsed the phased implementation approach, saying it allowed the City to see how the plan <br />worked in “real time.” Speaking to housing mix, Mr. Clark recalled that the council received testimony <br />suggesting that the information provided by the consultant EcoNorthwest did not represent the range well. <br />He did not find that the underlying data provided much clarity on the range, and he requested more <br />information about the data and methodology used by EcoNorthwest. <br /> <br />Ms. Taylor, seconded by Mr. Brown, moved to direct the City Manager to initiate code <br />amendments related to infill compatibility standards, opportunity siting, and mixed use <br />development. <br /> <br />Mr. Poling, seconded by Mr. Clark, moved to amend the motion to add the phrase “as <br />recommended by staff.” <br /> <br />Mr. Poling suggested that at this time, staff knew more about the process and what the council needed to <br />see next. He was more comfortable initiating the process using staff’s recommendations, pointing out <br />they could be changed by the council at a later time. <br /> <br />The amendment passed, 7:1; Ms. Taylor voting no. <br /> <br />The amended motion passed unanimously, 8:0. <br /> <br />Mayor Piercy adjourned the work session at 1:26 p.m. <br /> <br />Respectfully submitted, <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Beth Forrest <br />City Recorder <br /> <br />(Recorded by Kimberly Young) <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council May 25, 2011 Page 5 <br /> Work Session <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.