Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Public Benefits <br />After reviewing the Paradigm on Pearl application against the public benefit scoring criteria in the <br />Standards and Guidelines, staff determined that the proposed development earned 110 points. (A <br />minimum of 100 points is required for the City Manager to recommend that council approve an <br />application.) Points were awarded for the project through the following benefits: <br /> <br /> <br />Density: 50 points (10 points per unit in excess of the minimum code requirement; 50 point max) <br />o <br /> <br />Green Building Features and Quality of Building Materials: 50 points for Earth Advantage-gold <br />o <br />certification <br /> <br />Parking: 10 points (10 points per code space in excess of the minimum code requirement) <br />o <br /> <br />The project is contiguous to a historic structure. The applicant has a mitigation plan but it was not <br />accepted by Planning and Development Department staff to receive public benefit points because the <br />plan lacked sufficient information. <br /> <br />Impact and Need for Tax Exemptions to Encourage Housing <br />The City and other local taxing districts forgo revenue when property is exempted from taxes. Alder <br />Park Apartments will continue to generate property tax revenue on the land. The submitted application <br />indicates that the 2010 property tax was $5,762. After ten years, the entire development will be taxable, <br />generating an estimated $24,850 on the housing portion in year 11. The applicant also indicates that <br />MUPTE is vital to the development and, if it is denied, the property will be developed without the green <br />building features and with features not preferred by the neighborhood association (more bedrooms per <br />unit and reconfigured parking/garbage). <br /> <br /> <br />Financial Analysis <br />The applicant has demonstrated that the project as proposed could not be built but for the benefit of the <br />tax exemption. Staff and the Loan Advisory Committee reviewed the pro-forma and confirmed this <br />conclusion. (See Attachment F for more information.) <br /> <br />Timing <br />This application was submitted on May 20, 2011. The City Manager has 90 days (until August 18) to <br />make a recommendation to the council; if the council has not acted in 180 days, the application is <br />deemed approved. Additionally, the existing MUPTE ordinance expires for all projects unable to be <br />constructed by January 1, 2012. In order to qualify for the exemption, the applicant is required to <br />complete construction prior to January 1, 2012. If the project fails to be completed by the deadline due <br />to circumstances beyond the applicant’s control (such as a natural disaster, bankruptcy of key vendors, <br />or dissolution of the related financial institution), the council has the option to grant a one-year <br />extension. <br /> <br />The applicant provided a construction timeline showing that construction is expected to be complete on <br />or before January 1, 2012. However, some question remains about the ability to meet this timeline. In <br />light of this possibility, should the council decide to grant the exemption, the resolution approving the <br />exemption states explicitly that if the applicant is unable to complete the project and obtain a temporary <br />or final certificate of occupancy for the residential portion of the project prior to the deadline, that the <br />applicant will not receive the tax exemption and will have no expectation of being granted an extension. <br />The applicant is aware of the deadline and implications of not meeting it. <br /> \\Cesrv500\cc support\CMO\2011 Council Agendas\M110725\S1107253.doc <br />