Laserfiche WebLink
Councilor Clark distributed the resolution proposed by Mayor Piercy to the US Conference of Mayors. <br />He said he found the language in the CALC resolution somewhat incendiary but agreed entirely with its <br />sentiments. He suggested Mayor Piercy's resolution was a middle ground the council could support. <br />Councilor Clark read the resolution. <br />Councilor Clark, seconded by Councilor Poling, moved to substitute the text of <br />Resolution 5040 with the resolution adopted by the US Conference of Mayor with the <br />phrase "City of Eugene" inserted where the "US Conference of Mayors" appeared in the <br />resolution. <br />Councilor Brown did not support the motion because he believed the CALC resolution was more <br />complete. It addressed a broader range of services without being overly specific. He suggested if the <br />council wanted to be "super- specific" it would call out specific actions, such as ending homelessness and <br />opening the Egan Warming Center. His resolution urged the Congressional delegation to bring home the <br />troops and to return funding to the cities in the broad categories mentioned in the resolution. <br />Councilor Farr believed the findings in the resolution were difficult to refute but he opposed the use of the <br />phrase "on behalf of the people of Eugene" because he considered it divisive. He preferred the text in the <br />mayor's resolution. <br />Councilor Farr held out little hope that the federal government would send any money not spent on war to <br />Eugene. <br />Councilor Pryor pointed out all the resolutions wanted the same thing, which was to bring the troops <br />home safely and to redirect the money to a common purpose at home. He agreed with that fully. He <br />suggested the "sticking point" was how to say that and what to do with any money realized by ending the <br />wars. He suggested the council focus on the first question, that of the wars and whether they should be <br />ended. He believed there was strength in numbers, and if the council signed on to the resolution adopted <br />by the US Council of Mayors it might have more of an impact than if it adopted a resolution of its own. <br />He supported Councilor Clark's proposal. <br />Councilor Taylor said Councilor Brown's resolution was a local resolution drafted by local people that <br />represented local voices. She thought the resolution reinforced the message contained in the mayor's <br />resolution. Speaking to Councilor Farr's concerns about the use of the phrase "on behalf of the people of <br />Eugene," Councilor Taylor did not think that implied agreement on the part of all residents, but rather that <br />it was in the interests of the people of Eugene. She supported Councilor Brown's resolution. <br />Councilor Zelenka was impressed with the mayor's resolution and proud that the mayor had sponsored it. <br />He anticipated he would offer the council a motion to support that resolution as well. <br />Councilor Brown believed the mayor's resolution was appropriately addressed through the forum of the <br />US Conference of Mayors and it was time for a local resolution. He suggested that councilors interested <br />in passing the mayor's resolution should have raised the concept when CALC asked him to present the <br />resolution to the council. He thought last- minute substitutions subverted the purity of the original <br />resolution. <br />Councilor Poling objected to how Councilor Brown had characterized amendments to the resolution as <br />last - minute given that he had given the council ample notice of his intention to offer revisions. He <br />intended to support Councilor Clark's motion and said if that failed he would not be able to support the <br />proposed resolution because of his stated objections to the text. <br />MINUTES— Eugene City Council June 27, 2011 Page 5 <br />Regular Meeting <br />