My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item B: Neighborhood Livability Working Group Report
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2011
>
CC Agenda - 09/14/11 Work Session
>
Item B: Neighborhood Livability Working Group Report
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/9/2011 2:21:42 PM
Creation date
9/9/2011 1:09:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
9/14/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
63
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Neighborhood Livability Working Group <br />Strategy 2003 Update 2011 Update <br />Neighborhood Association West University Neighbors were <br />Actively encourage renewed reactivated in 2003. <br />participation in a neighborhood <br />association to continue neighborhood <br />building and resident involvement in <br />area improvements. <br />0RGLI\6WXGHQW&RQGXFW&RGH The UO is reviewing its student <br />Consider modifying the student conduct code and off-campus <br />conduct code to include punitive jurisdiction for serious criminal <br />measures against students involved conduct is one of many issues being <br />with serious criminal conduct, such as examined. Codes from all over the <br />rioting, off-campus. country are being reviewed to see <br />how off-campus behavior is <br />handled. <br />Patrols by Non-Police This could The annual UO Community Welcome <br />include student groups handing out involves groups of university staff, <br />literature to residents at the students, City staff and neighbors <br />beginning of each term on how to canvassing the campus area and <br />have a safe party or establishing greeting students and distributing <br />neighborhood watch programs to literature that includes information <br />assist in monitoring activity in the on behavioral expectations including <br />neighborhood and contacting police how to throw a safe party. <br />before parties get out of control. <br />Intervention with party hosts has <br />potential risks and would need <br />careful consideration. <br />City Nuisance Complaint System <br />Review current nuisance complaint complaint driven. Staff is typically <br />system to see if it can be streamlined able to respond to the complainant <br />for ease of access, and enforcement within 24 to 48 hours. Depending on <br />options expanded and/or the priority level an Order will <br />strengthened to improve its usually go out within five days of <br />effectiveness. receipt of the complaint. A <br />proactive based enforcement <br />program would require more <br />resources and a well-developed <br />plan on how to address concerns of <br />selective enforcement. <br /> <br /> <br />11 <br />Page <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.