Laserfiche WebLink
Neighborhood Livability Working Group <br />SECTION II: BACKGROUND <br /> <br />In March of 2010, nearly 40 people gathered for a Livability Summit organized by residents of campus area <br />neighborhoods in conjunction with the University of Oregon. The Summit was in direct response to long-term <br />pacts to their quality of life primarily from noise and other undesirable <br />behaviors fueled by binge drinking youth. A variety of stakeholder interests were represented including <br />neighborhood associations, city staff, elected officials, university administrators, and property management <br />companies. The group heard stories about impacts from behaviors of concern, reviewed current efforts to <br />address the problem, and discussed the need for creative solutions that recognize limited resources and <br />competing priorities facing the police department. A recommendation was made to organize a group of <br />stakeholder representatives to continue meeting to identify potential solutions to the problem. This resulted in <br />the creation of the Neighborhood Livability Working Group. <br />Program. Participation includes representatives from five main stakeholder groups: City, University of <br />Oregon, neighborhood associations, property owners/managers and students (See Section I for a complete <br />list of Working Group members). In the ensuing 14 months, the Working Group has accomplished a number <br />of tasks: <br />Created a Catalogue of Negative Behaviors and Impacts document that categorizes and explains the <br /> <br />negative behaviors and impacts of living in proximity to the university (Appendix A). <br />Gathered data on crime and other neighborhood characteristics to clarify current conditions and <br /> <br />trends (see Section III and Appendix B and C) <br />Assessed progress to date on implementing strategies recommended by the West University Task <br /> <br />Force in 2003 (Section IV). <br />Documented current efforts to protect neighborhood livability led by all stakeholder groups (Section <br /> <br />V). This document reveals that a significant amount of resource and effort is already being devoted <br />to this problem. <br />Conducted research on best practices in other communities to identify potential strategies and assess <br /> <br />potential effectiveness of ideas generated by the working group. This included Working Group <br />member attendance at the 2011 International Town and Gown Association Conference. <br />Identified potential new strategies (Section VI). Vetted strategies requiring City action with Municipal <br /> <br />Court staff, City Attorney and City Prosecutor for consistency with current law and practice. <br />Purpose of This Report and Next Steps <br />This document is intended as a report on progress to date. It is not intended as a set of final <br />recommendations for decision-makers. While all stakeholder groups have actively participated and <br />, there remain differing <br />opinions on the appropriateness and potential effectiveness of several of the strategies on the list. The <br />Working Group still needs time to collect information and thoroughly discuss several of the strategies to try to <br />address existing stakeholder concerns. <br />There is also interest in a group of stakeholders continuing to meet to address livability issues and track <br />progress on implementing proposed strategies. It is likely that some form of the current Working Group will <br />continue meeting less frequently to address this need. <br /> <br />3 <br />Page <br />