My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC Minutes - 07/11/11 Meeting
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Minutes
>
2011
>
CC Minutes - 07/11/11 Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/23/2012 11:42:04 AM
Creation date
9/13/2011 4:04:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Minutes
Meeting_Type
Meeting
CMO_Meeting_Date
7/11/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Nick Urhausen, 3058 Hawkins Lane, suggested it was both a privilege and a right for people to recite the <br />Pledge of Allegiance. He would not compel anyone to say the pledge but he did not think people had the <br />right not to hear it. It did not take long to say the pledge. Mr. Urhausen pointed out that Eugene was a <br />political entity of the United States whether the community liked it or not. He found it hypocritical that <br />the council had discussed the peace dividend it wished to receive from the same nation that some <br />councilors were reluctant to say the Pledge of Allegiance to. <br />Mr. Urhausen recalled that the community had voted to fly the flag on Skinner Butte and suggested the <br />council place a measure regarding the pledge on the ballot. <br />Al Rogers, 528 Kingswood Avenue, did not understand the council's decision to recite the Pledge of <br />Allegiance at only four meetings. He said the pledge contained 31 words and it took only 12 seconds to <br />say it. He expressed concern that those opposed to saying the pledge did not take time to learn the <br />meaning behind the words of the pledge. Mr. Rogers suggested that residents' recognition of the <br />contribution of veterans in combination with the pledge would help local veterans feel more appreciated. <br />Diane Thurlow, 217 Crest Drive, questioned how Councilor Taylor could compare the voluntary recital <br />of the Pledge of Allegiance with the voluntary reading of the Communist Manifesto and how Councilor <br />Brown could suggest that the pledge should only be said on residents' private property. She suggested <br />that several councilors did not like what the country stood for and sought a "One World Order" where no <br />country had more than any other country. That would require the United States to be destroyed. She <br />maintained such individuals had hijacked the word "progressive" and were using it to justify tax increases <br />and declines in education and moral values. Ms. Thurlow said such individuals discussed diversity but <br />only tolerated those who shared their viewpoint. She asked what about the pledge was divisive. She <br />suggested that the councilors involved were receiving a lot of quality from the nation they were reluctant <br />to pledge allegiance to. <br />Ms. Thurlow maintained that Mayor Piercy was affiliated with the organization "Code Pink," an anti - <br />Israeli organization that sponsored the two flotillas attempted to break Israeli's Gaza blockade, which was <br />established to prevent arms smuggling. Code Pink worked hand in hand with former members of the <br />Weather Underground on such missions. She characterized Mayor Piercy and other members of the <br />council as enemies of the people and urged citizens to speak up and defend the pledge, the original <br />Constitution, the Bill of Rights, the flag, and the values that had made the nation great. <br />Bob Macherione, 1994 Brewer Street, owner of a business at 6 Avenue and Lincoln Street, suggested <br />that reciting the Pledge of Allegiance did not necessarily make one a good citizen of the community. He <br />respected everyone's right to say the pledge or not. All were citizens of the same country and deserved <br />the same level of respect. <br />Mr. Macherione said he had not personally expected to have his free speech threatened by anonymous <br />complaints about Sign Code violations and had not expected personal attacks on his opinions from the <br />acting head of Lane Transit District (LTD). He was a member of the public and a taxpayer and was <br />trying to provide some information that he had been told was welcome. If his input to LTD was not valid <br />he wondered whose input was valid. Mr. Macherione intended to return to his message, which was that <br />LTD could give free student passes to everyone because it would not reduce the agency's cost not to do <br />so. He said that LTD had a $36 million budget and lost $50,000 monthly, and for that amount was <br />willing to throw 10 percent of its ridership off the bus. Mr. Macherione thought that was wrong. It was <br />improper for a transit system that asserted its own progressiveness to stop that service. <br />MINUTES— Eugene City Council July 11, 2011 Page 2 <br />Regular Meeting <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.