Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Public feedback on the two scenarios has been limited in quantity, but the quality of input has been high <br />because of the interest of those who have taken opportunities to participate in different ways. An online <br />public survey and interactive ward maps are available on the City’s website. In the last five months, staff <br />has provided ongoing updates to a growing list of interested parties, generated news releases, responded <br />to media requests, sent information through neighborhood leaders, offered to meet with neighborhood <br />and civic groups, and held a public forum. Some constituency groups – Lane County League of Women <br />Voters, Eugene Area Chamber of Commerce and Neighborhood Leaders Council – have continued to <br />follow the process closely. <br /> <br />While the public feedback has been mixed, at this time there appears to be slightly more support for <br />Scenario 1 or a revised scenario that would be similar. While some have been intrigued by the Scenario <br />2 impacts on Ward 5, there also has been concern about addressing the Santa Clara neighborhood <br />without fully considering impacts of new boundaries on other neighborhoods. Taking Ward 3 across the <br />river also has raised some concerns as being a significant change for residents. <br /> <br />A question has arisen about whether it would be possible to draw Ward 3 boundaries to retain or add <br />more likely voters. The percentage of registered voters in Ward 3 currently is lower than in other wards <br />and both scenarios show no appreciable change. While voter registration is not and cannot be a major <br />criterion, staff has considered other ways to “grow” Ward 2 into Ward 3, but has been unable to <br />maintain wards that are relatively compact and contiguous. <br /> <br />Another issue staff has heard concerns the relationship between ward boundaries and the boundaries for <br />neighborhood associations. Staff considered school attendance and neighborhood association <br />boundaries, although these were not primary criteria adopted by the council. The recognized <br />neighborhood association boundaries vary significantly and strict alignment with ward boundary options <br />was impossible to achieve while striving for near-equal populations across wards. An attachment shows <br />the breakdown of neighborhood associations by councilor. For some, an issue is the number of <br />associations a single councilor might represent or the number of councilors any one neighborhood <br />association might have as its elected representatives. <br /> <br />The council is scheduled for a Monday, September 26, work session on ward redistricting at which <br />direction on an existing or alternative scenario, along with suggested refinements, ideally would be <br />provided. The council is scheduled to adopt a resolution and new ward boundaries on October 24. <br /> <br />To facilitate election-related activities, the final boundary decision should occur well before the 2012 <br />filing deadline for the seats that will be up for election next May for the Eugene City Council and <br />Eugene Water & Electric Board. Candidates could begin filing on September 8, 2011, and must turn in <br />all materials to the City Recorder by February 29, 2012. <br /> <br /> <br />RELATED CITY POLICIES <br />The Eugene Charter provision related to redistricting is general and states: <br /> <br />Section 33. Wards. The council shall divide the city into wards and redefine the boundaries thereof as <br />necessary to accord persons in the city the equal protection of the laws. No person may vote at a city <br />election in a ward other than that in which he or she resides. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> S:\CMO\2011 Council Agendas\M110919\09-19-11 Item 3 - Ward Redistricting Scenarios.doc <br /> <br />