Laserfiche WebLink
<br />This is a status report of Police Commission activities from July 2010 through June 2011. Please <br />contact past Chair Tamara Miller at 541-686-7198, or staff with any questions. <br /> <br />The Police Commission’s FY 2011 Work Plan was approved by the City Council on July 21, 2010. <br />The items contained in the work plan are intended to address the Commission’s goals which are <br />called out in the Commission bylaws and the enabling ordinance, and listed below: <br /> <br />The Commission should <br />1. Increase communications between police and the community, leading to a greater <br />understanding of the preferred policing alternatives for the city. <br />2. Identify police policy and resource issues related to preferred policing alternative <br />3. Decrease misunderstandings regarding the nature of adopted police policies, <br />practices and approaches. <br />4. Provide input on police policies that reflect community values. <br />5. Assist the City Council in balancing community priorities and resources by <br />advising it on police resource issues. <br /> <br />The work plan was designed to address these issues, and did so through the following items: <br /> <br />Review of Police Policies and Recommended Modifications <br />During FY 2011, the Commission reviewed several police policies and issues, soliciting community <br />input and making recommendations that reflected that feedback. <br /> <br />Downtown Public Safety Zone Ordinance (DPSZ) <br /> As directed in Ordinance #20419, the Police Commission sponsored a special public forum in <br />September 2010 regarding the DPSZ. The two-hour forum was attended by approximately 50 <br />community members. The Commission recommended to City Council that the DPSZ ordinance <br />should be adopted and noted three outstanding issues that should be addressed prior to <br />adopting the ordinance: 1) adding some sexual offenses and tying related State statutes to the <br />Eugene Code; 2) consider options to mitigate the concerns related to due process; 3) consider <br />greater support and funding to social service agencies to aid in the overall criminal justice <br />system. Council subsequently adopted the ordinance and addressed items 1 and 2 in the new <br />ordinance. <br /> <br /> Systematic Review of Police Policies <br /> As the Police Department updates its policy manual, the Police Commission reviewed numerous <br />policies, soliciting community input, developing recommendations and advising the Police Chief <br />on proposed changes that reflect the community values, and input received. Much of the <br />preliminary work of this policy review was conducted by the following two committees: <br /> <br /> Policy Screening & Review Committee (PSRC) <br /> The PSRC is designed as a multi-year effort to assist the department in updating the police <br />policy manual, utilizing the Lexipol structure as the framework for a comprehensive review. <br />Through public meetings and outreach to interested stakeholders, the PSRC is able to <br />provide the community’s perspective on important police policies. In FY 2011, the following <br />policies were reviewed, and comments provided to the Chief of Police: <br /> Policy Manual <br /> Use of EPD Logo <br /> Attempts to Locate <br /> Community Service Officers <br /> Release of Public Records <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />