My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Ordinance No. 20326
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Ordinances
>
2004 No. 20307-20332
>
Ordinance No. 20326
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/10/2010 4:45:26 PM
Creation date
8/2/2004 2:50:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Recorder
CMO_Document_Type
Ordinances
Document_Date
7/26/2004
Document_Number
20326
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2. Modifies Map 2, which shows Planned Wastewater Facilities, and adds Map 2a that <br /> concerns Existing Wastewater Facilities. <br /> <br />3. Modifies the existing narrative on "Wastewater System Condition Assessment" in <br /> Chapter IV. (Page 82) <br /> <br />4. Modifies existing paragraphs #1 and #2 under the discussion of "Wastewater" in the <br /> subdivision entitled "Long Term Service Availability Within Urbanizable Areas" in <br /> Chapter IV. (Page 97). <br /> <br />5. Adds new Table 16a (following Table 16) entitled "MWMC Wastewater Treatment and <br /> Collection System Improvements, Rough Cost Estimate, and Timing Estimate." (Page <br /> 101) <br /> <br />6. Adds new Chapter VI regarding amendments to the PFSP. <br /> <br />Metropolitan Area General plan Amendment Criteria <br /> <br />The proposed amendments are considered to be Type I Metro Plan amendments because they are <br />non-site specific amendments to the Plan text. Amendments to the Plan text, which include <br />changes to functional plans such as TransPlan and the PFSP, and that are non-site specific <br />require approval by all three governing bodies to become effective.2 <br /> <br />Springfield, Eugene and Lane County each adopted identical Metro Plan amendment criteria into <br />their respective implementing ordinances and codes. Springfield Code Section 7.070(3) (a & b), <br />Eugene Code 9.7730(3)(a)(b), and Lane Code 12.225(2) (a & b) require that the amendment be <br />consistent with relevant statewide planning goals and that the amendment will not make the <br />Metro Plan internally inconsistent. These criteria are addressed as follows: <br /> <br />(a) The antendment must be consistent with the relevant statewide planning goals adopted <br /> by the Land Conservation and Development Commission; <br /> <br /> Goal 1- Citizen Involvement <br /> To develop a citizen involvement program that insures the opportumty for citizens to be <br /> revolved in all phases of the lvlanning process. <br /> The two cities and the county have acknowledged land use codes that are intended to <br /> serve as the principal implementing ordinances for the Metro Plan. Citizen involvement <br /> for a Type I Metro Plan amendment not related to an urban growth boundary amendment <br /> requires: 1) Notice to interested parties; 2) Notice shall be published in a newspaper of <br /> general circulation; 3) Notice shall be provided to the Department of Land Conservation <br /> and Development (DLCD) at least 45 days before the initial evidentiary hearing <br /> (planning commission). <br /> <br /> 2 <br /> See EC 9.7730(1)(a), SDC 7.070(1)(a), and LC 12.225(1)(a)(~). <br /> <br />Exhibit 1 - 3 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.