Laserfiche WebLink
· The City lacks a clear policy for economic development. Committee <br /> members stressed that the City should have a clear, consistent, and <br /> focused commitment to economic development that can remain stable <br /> through business cycles. <br /> <br /> · Wages in the community are low relative to state and national averages. <br /> <br /> · The City's regulations and land use code are too complex, inconsistent, <br /> and burdensome, and the rules are inconsistently applied. <br /> <br /> · Land supply is an important issue for commercial and industrial <br /> development and there is no agreement about the existing supply of land <br /> in Eugene. <br /> <br /> · Redevelopment of underused sites should be encouraged. <br /> <br /> · Infrastructure is important. <br /> <br /> · There are few public financial incentives for new or growing businesses. If <br /> the City had incentives, what should it require in return for the incentives? <br /> What types of businesses should be offered public incentives? The role of <br /> public incentives is controversial in community development. <br /> <br /> · The City should support ecologically'sustainable businesses and business <br /> practices. <br /> <br /> · Economic development strategies, or lack thereof, have regional impacts, <br /> and policies addressing it should take that into consideration. <br /> <br /> · There is a perception--locally and even outside the state--that the City of <br /> Eugene is a place with a policy and pOlitical environment that is <br /> indifferent, if not hostile, toward business and economic growth. <br /> <br /> SIGNIFICANT AREAS OF DISCUSSION <br /> The Committee also discussed at some length whether it should move directly <br /> from issues (problems) directly to policy recommendations (solutions), or whether <br /> it needed an intermediate step of developing principles that would provide some <br /> direction for the types of tools to be considered and adopted. It discussed draft <br /> principles but eventually voted not to adopt principles, in part because of time <br /> constraints, and in part because a majority of members believed that they could <br /> get to the heart of their assignment (agreeing on tools) without having agreed on <br /> principles. <br /> <br /> At least four issues of importance to many of the Committee members are not <br /> addressed explicitly in the recommendations. The Committee believes some <br /> discussion of these issues is important here to provide context for the <br /> recommendations that follow. Additionally, the City Council should consider how <br /> future policy changes affect these issues: <br /> <br /> · Wages. The Committee agrees that one of the fundamental objective of <br /> economic development should be to increase wages for Eugene's citizens. <br /> The Committee discussed language to make incentives contingent on <br /> providing some minimum number of jobs with wages higher than the <br /> countywide median. In the end, problems with definition, measurement, <br /> <br />Page 6 Recommendations July 2004 Mayor's Committee on Economic Development <br /> <br /> <br />